Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity of A9 and A10 dopaminergic neurons in unrestrained rats: further characterization and effects of apomorphine and cholecystokinin

Open access
Freeman, Arthur S., Bunney, Benjamin S.·1987·Brain Research

Abstract

The activity of single dopaminergic (DA) neurons (total n = 77) in the midbrain of awake, unrestrained rats was examined. The firing rates and patterns of ventral tegmental area (A10) cells (n = 39) were similar to those of identified DA neurons in anesthetized and paralyzed rats. Unit activity was briefly stimulated (increased firing rate and burst activity) in response to an auditory stimulus and during manual stimulation of the vibrissae. Similar changes occurred during orienting responses and periods of sniffing. Twenty-six percent of A10 cells recorded appeared to be electronically coupled which matched the prevalence previously observed among A9 neurons. The effects on A9 and A10 DA cell activity of apomorphine and the carboxyterminal octapeptide of cholecystokinin (CCK-8) were then determined. Sequential doses of apomorphine (5-320 micrograms/kg, i.v.) reduced the firing rate of each neuron tested (n = 19). Ten of these cells were classified as 'sensitive' to the drug (ED50 less than 20 micrograms/kg), while the remainder were considerably 'less sensitive' (ED50 greater than 30 micrograms/kg). Cells of either sensitivity were as likely to be found in A9 as in A10. Sulfated CCK-8 (1-16 micrograms/kg, i.v.) excited (firing rate and bursting increased) 73% of the A9 neurons sampled but produced inconsistent effects on A10 cell firing. CCK-8 pretreatment increased the percentage of A9 and A10 neurons which were classified as 'sensitive' to apomorphine (82%). Enhanced sensitivity to apomorphine occurred regardless of the effect of CCK-8 on unit firing. Thus, as has been found in anesthetized rats, CCK-8 appeared to enhance the inhibitory effects of a DA agonist on DA neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90988-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, A. S., & Bunney, B. S.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-03
Volume
405
Issue
1
Pages
46-55
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024511383
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity of A9 and A10 dopaminergic neurons in unrestrained rats: further characterization and effects of apomorphine and cholecystokinin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90988-7
The paper
Freeman, A. S., & Bunney, B. S. (1987). Activity of A9 and A10 dopaminergic neurons in unrestrained rats: further characterization and effects of apomorphine and cholecystokinin. Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90988-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.