Cited by 182Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Gender differences in working memory networks: a BrainMap meta-analysis

Open access
Hill, Ashley C., Laird, Angela R., Robinson, Jennifer L.·2014·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Gender differences in psychological processes have been of great interest in a variety of fields. While the majority of research in this area has focused on specific differences in relation to test performance, this study sought to determine the underlying neurofunctional differences observed during working memory, a pivotal cognitive process shown to be predictive of academic achievement and intelligence. Using the BrainMap database, we performed a meta-analysis and applied activation likelihood estimation to our search set. Our results demonstrate consistent working memory networks across genders, but also provide evidence for gender-specific networks whereby females consistently activate more limbic (e.g., amygdala and hippocampus) and prefrontal structures (e.g., right inferior frontal gyrus), and males activate a distributed network inclusive of more parietal regions. These data provide a framework for future investigations using functional or effective connectivity methods to elucidate the underpinnings of gender differences in neural network recruitment during working memory tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.008

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A more parsimonious interpretation is that during early-to-mid adolescence males use functional coupling between the basolateral amygdala and parieto-occipital regions for memory functions, supported by adult and adolescent research.

    “An alternative, and more parsimonious interpretation, is that males rely on a functional coupling between BLA and parieto-occipital brain regions for memory functions during this early- to mid-adolescent period, which is supported by research in adults and adolescents (Darki and Klingberg, 2014, Hill et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, A. C., Laird, A. R., & Robinson, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Jennifer L.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
102
Pages
18-29
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056269711
Cited by
182
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (R01-MH074457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
gender differences, working memory, brain networks, limbic system, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, parietal cortex, neural recruitment, BrainMap
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Likelihood Functions, Databases, Factual, Prefrontal Cortex, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review