The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025327 · Cited by 2,827
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Clark, H. H. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80014-3 · Cited by 2,222
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80048-8 · Cited by 1,523
Mental imagery in associative learning and memory.
Paivio, A. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027272 · Cited by 1,358
The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80040-3 · Cited by 1,294
Borsay, L. A., & Lyons, J. (1972) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/324060 · Cited by 1,151
The Analysis of Sentence Production
Garrett, M. F. (1975) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60270-4 · Cited by 976
Levels of processing in sentence production
Garrett, M. F. (1980) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 864
Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
Flavell, J. H., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 735
Bock, J. K. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.89.1.1 · Cited by 695
Cited by
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density
Florian Jaeger, T. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 · Cited by 733
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Connectionist Models of Language Production: Lexical Access and Grammatical Encoding
Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)00014-2 · Cited by 339
A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0169 · Cited by 332
Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production
Lee, E.-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.007 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Kathryn Bock, J., & Warren, R. K.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-67
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063095222
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-x
- The paper
- Kathryn Bock, J., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
