Cited by 157AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningCognitive Abilities and TestingVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

A process model for water jug problems

Atwood, Michael E, Polson, Peter G·1976·Cognitive Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90023-2

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water-jug problems can be constructed such that they put a substantial burden on working memory.

    “Water-jug problems can be constructed such that they put a substantial burden on working memory (Atwood & Polson, 1976;Atwood, Masson, & Polson, 1980).”

    From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Atwood & Polson, 1976

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atwood, M. E., & Polson, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Colorado System (US)
Corresponding author
Atwood, Michael E
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
191-216
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009716227
Cited by
157
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
process model, means-ends analysis, problem difficulty, short-term memory, long-term memory, forward planning, problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review