Cited by 26Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceMemory Processes and Influences

Why do people fail to see simple solutions? Using think-aloud protocols to uncover the mechanism behind the Einstellung (mental set) effect

Blech, Christine, Gaschler, Robert, Bilalić, Merim·2020·Thinking & Reasoning

Abstract

Einstellung (mental set) effects designate the phenomenon where established routines can prevent people from finding other, possibly more efficient solutions. Here we investigate the mechanism behind this phenomenon by using Luchins’ classical water jug paradigm with concurrent verbalization. We find no difference in the extent of the Einstellung effect between the group which was instructed to think aloud during the problem solving and the group which was thinking silently. The think-aloud protocols indicate that the participants who exhibited the Einstellung effect repeatedly attempted to solve the water jug problem by using variations of the previously successful method which had been rendered inappropriate in the final problem. Our study underlines the usefulness of the think-aloud technique in tracking the cognitive processes. More importantly, it demonstrates how, once thought has been activated, it may bias subsequent dealings with new situations, even in the face of repeated failure that people experience in the Einstellung situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13546783.2019.1685001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blech, C., Gaschler, R., & Bilalić, M.
Affiliations
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
  • Department of Psychology, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Corresponding author
Blech, Christine
Venue
Thinking & Reasoning
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
552-580
ISSN
  • 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0708
OpenAlex
W2985039534
Cited by
26
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
Einstellung effect, mental set, think-aloud, problem solving, cognitive biases, solution search, cognitive processes, verbalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review