The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When individuals make judgments, the dilution effect occurs when people fail to use diagnostic information in the presence of nondiagnostic information (Nisbett et al., 1981).”
From Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2021) · cites this paper as Nisbett et al., 1981
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates.
Pfautz, H. W., & Goffman, E. (1962) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090043 · Cited by 8,308
Tversky, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.327 · Cited by 7,414
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Self-citationEichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil
J., D., & Arendt, H. (1965) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3319667 · Cited by 3,626
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0037613 · Cited by 1,887
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, by Hannah Arendt
Burin, F. S. (1964) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2146583 · Cited by 1,651
Attribution and the psychology of prediction.
Nisbett, R. E., & Borgida, E. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.932 · Cited by 645
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cantor, 1979, Categorization processes in the perception of people, Vol. 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 605
Dalal, D. K., Sassaman, L., & Zhu, X. (2020) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2020.02.007 · Cited by 16
“Although individuals have various sources of information at their disposal when making decisions,(2) decisions are most accurate when made using only relevant information given the specific context of the decision (Nisbett et al., 1981).”
BackgroundInfluentialAccessibility and fit as determinants of the salience of social categorizations
Blanz, M. (1999) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199902)29:1 · Cited by 105
Artificial intelligence dialects of the Bayesian belief revision language
Schocken, S., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.44027 · Cited by 16
Anchoring and adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from Switzerland
Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D., & Hunziker, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/jaar-01-2020-0011 · Cited by 15
Lee, V. K., Kranton, R. E., Conzo, P., & Huettel, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102424 · Cited by 16
Eyes Wide Shut? Understanding and Managing Consumers’ Visual Processing of Country‐of‐Origin Cues
Halkias, G., Florack, A., Diamantopoulos, A., & Palcu, J. (2021) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12545 · Cited by 15
Walker, J., Tepper, S. J., & Gilovich, T. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2100430118 · Cited by 15
“Research on the “dilution effect” shows that adding entirely uninformative information about a member of a group (a senior citizen who lives in a blue house and likes toast, a fraternity member who grew up in the suburbs of Dayton, Ohio, and likes to swim) makes that person seem less prototypical of the group (15).”
BackgroundSacchi, S., & Burigo, M. (2008) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.135.3.252-270 · Cited by 15
“In accord with the dilution effect (Nisbett et al., 1981; Zukier, 1982), we found a negative correlation between the amount of irrelevant data and final judgment polarization, r = –.”
BackgroundOn the Courtroom Use and Misuse of Gender Stereotyping Research
Borgida, E., Rudman, L. A., & Manteufel, L. L. (1995) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01316.x · Cited by 15
Wang, X., Chang, Y., Li, X., & Yan, J. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12919 · Cited by 14
Lee, C. J. (2006) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393106287235 · Cited by 14
Does Greater Amount of Information Always Bolster Attitudinal Resistance?
Muthukrishnan, A. V., Pham, M. T., & Mungalé, A. (2001) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1011113002473 · Cited by 14
And Yet They Move: The Impact of Direction of Deviance on Stereotype Change
Dolderer, M., Mummendey, A., & Rothermund, K. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209339783 · Cited by 14
Information Exchange in Personnel Selection Decisions
Dose, J. J. (2003) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00133 · Cited by 14
Category Dynamics and the Modification of Outgroup Stereotypes
Rothbart, M. (2003) · doi:10.1002/9780470693421.ch3 · Cited by 14
Impact of Diffusion and Variability on Vendor Performance Evaluation
Doerr, K. H., & Lewis, I. A. (2005) · doi:10.21236/ada444084 · Cited by 14
“For example, people tend to judge the quality of a product or service higher when they have to wait longer for it ( Maister, 1985 ).”
BackgroundUsing Shareholder Letters to Measure CEO IntegrityPreprint
Dikolli, S. S., Keusch, T., Mayew, W. J., & Steffen, T. D. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 14
Farrell, A. M., & Frank, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-2020-031 · Cited by 15
“…performance that capture abilities that are relevant for the current but not the higher-level position (one subset of non-overlapping abilities); these should be ignored, but ignoring information is notoriously difficult to do (Nisbett, Zukier, and Lemley 1981; Tetlock, Lerner, and Boettger 1996).”
BackgroundSymptom Validity Testing: Unresolved Questions, Future Directions
Lilienfeld, S. O., Thames, A. D., & Watts, A. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.028312 · Cited by 13
Influence of Experience and Accountability on Information Use and Judgments of Accountants
Mala, R., Chand, P., & Patel, C. (2018) · Journal of International Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jiar-52191 · Cited by 13
Stereotypes on Campus: How Contact and Liking Influence Perceptions of Group Distinctiveness
Biernat, M. (1990) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01489.x · Cited by 13
Does the Dilution Effect Have a Conversational Basis?
Kemmelmeier, M. (2007) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x06296472 · Cited by 13
“…is considered, but its affective valence (positive vs. negative) instead, it is clear that the dilution effect also occurs for positive (diagnostic) information, although it is sometimes weaker for positive than for negative information (e.g., Kemmelmeier, 2004; Nisbett et al., 1981, Study 5).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialProximity, Compatibility, and Noncomplementarity in Subjective Probability
Yamagishi, K. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2959 · Cited by 13
“Numerous replications have observed (e.g., Nisbett, Zukier, & Lemley, 1981; Agnoli & Krantz, 1989; Reeves & Lockhart, 1993) that the likelihood judgment that X belongs to C is judged by how X is similar to C. Assume further that dissimilarity serves as a heuristic to judge whether X does not belong to C. Under this as…”
BackgroundInconsistency and uncertainty in multi‐attribute judgment of human performance
Ganzach, Y. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070305 · Cited by 13
Behavioral challenges to professional skepticism in auditors’ data analytics journey
Li, X. (2022) · Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie · doi:10.5117/mab.96.78525 · Cited by 11
“…irrelevant information into their testing may suffer from the dilution effect, which occurs when irrelevant information negatively influences decision makers’ evaluation of relevant information (e.g., Nisbett et al. 1981; Hackenbrack 1992; Hoffman and Patton 1997; Waller and Zimbelman 2003).”
BackgroundJenkins, M. D., & Gomez, D. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612221111997 · Cited by 12
“…con fl icting views (Fox and Rottenstreich 2003; Koehler 2016), because of dif fi culties individuals have recognizing biased selection of opinions (Koehler and Mercer 2009), “ cancelling out ” (Nisbett et al. 1981), or simply because con fl icting opinions induces uncertainty (De Neys et al. 2011).”
BackgroundDo publications in low-impact journals help or hurt a CV?
Donnelly, K., McKenzie, C. R. M., & Müller‐Trede, J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000228 · Cited by 12
Seow, J. L. (2008) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-629x.2008.00268.x · Cited by 12
Mood and positive testing in social interaction
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., Grégoire, C., & Sarlet, M. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.725 · Cited by 12
Böhmer, I., Hörstermann, T., Gräsel, C., Krolak‐Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:11490 · Cited by 12
STEREOTYPICAL PROCESSING: THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
Lawrence, C., & Leather, P. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0147 · Cited by 12
On disregarding deviants: Exemplar typicality and person perception
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Castelli, L. (1999) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-999-1016-0 · Cited by 12
“The failure of the neutral information to eliminate stereotype activation is inconsistent with the view that stereotypes are easily diluted by irrelevant information ( Nisbett et al., 1981 ) and suggests that in the absence of explicitly disconfirmatory information, perceivers encode exemplars as generally representat…”
BackgroundThe Use of Abstract Trait Knowledge and Behavioral Exemplars in Causal Explanations of Behavior
Budesheim, T. L., & Bonnelle, K. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298246002 · Cited by 12
Tan, S., & Tan, H. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1126243 · Cited by 12
Refutations of equivocal claims: No evidence for an ironic effect of counterargument number.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Jayawardana, K., & Mladenovic, A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/h0101834 · Cited by 11
Black, P. W., Cecchini, M. S., & Newman, A. H. (2024) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2024.101565 · Cited by 11
Goal-relevant versus incidental similarity when choosing between multiple service providers
Arndt, A. D., Karande, K. W., Harrison, K., & Khoshgadam, L. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.012 · Cited by 11
Neuropsychological autopsy of testamentary capacity: Methodology and issues in the elderly
Zago, S., & Bolognini, N. (2020) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2020.1791869 · Cited by 13
“When medical records are available, it is not uncommon for them to include information that is irrelevant to the legal question of testamentary capacity or which dilutes the relevance of other clinical information with extremely high relevance to the referral question (Nisbett et al., 1981).”
BackgroundBrand extension similarity can backfire when you look for something specific
Dimitriu, R., Warlop, L., & Samuelsen, B. M. (2017) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-09-2015-0662 · Cited by 11
What Attorneys and Factfinders Need to Know About Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries
Kaufman, N. K., Bush, S. S., & Aguilar, M. R. (2019) · Psychological Injury and Law · doi:10.1007/s12207-019-09355-9 · Cited by 11
Steinmetz, J., Touré‐Tillery, M., & Ayelet Fishbach, B. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000201 · Cited by 11
Cognitive feedback in environments characterized by irrelevant information
Sengupta, K. (1995) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(94)00061-e · Cited by 11
Hypothesis Testing and the Perception of Diagnosticity
Garcia‐Marques, L., Sherman, S. J., & Palma‐Oliveira, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1441 · Cited by 11
To thy own self be true: finding the utility of cognitive information feedback
Youmans, R. J., & Stone, E. R. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.508 · Cited by 11
Confidence and Investors' Reliance on Disciplined Trading StrategiesPreprint
Nelson, M. W., Krische, S. D., & Bloomfield, R. J. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.248131 · Cited by 11
An empirical study on the relationship between consumption emotions and brand loyalty
Geng, L., & Li, X. (2018) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750.2018.1445118 · Cited by 15
“Nevertheless, information that is unrelated to product attributes can also reduce the probability of making a drastic decision (Nisbett et al., 1981).”
BackgroundInfluentialTesting the value of expert insight: Comparing local versus general expert judgment models
Yu, M. C., & Kuncel, N. R. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12356 · Cited by 10
Wedell, D. H. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.686 · Cited by 10
Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.039 · Cited by 10
Information as a Moderator of Accuracy in Personality Judgment
Beer, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190912529.013.9 · Cited by 10
Merkel, S., Ho, F.-C., Schmidt, S. L., & Torgler, B. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12266 · Cited by 8
Idiosyncratic matching and choice: When less is more
Liberman, V., & Ross, L. D. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.006 · Cited by 10
Who should stand next to the suspect? Problems in the assessment of lineup fairness.
Gonzalez, R., Davis, J., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.4.525 · Cited by 10
Denhaerinck, P., Lfyens, J., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1989) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420190305 · Cited by 10
Koch, C., & Wustemann, J. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1032961 · Cited by 7
The More You Know: The Impact of Personal Knowledge on Interpersonal Treatment at Work
Hardin, A. E. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.15606 · Cited by 9
When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty.
Nett, N., Bröder, A., & Frings, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000109 · Cited by 9
The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision.
Albrecht, R., Jenny, M. A., Nilsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000299 · Cited by 9
Individual-Targeted Tolerance and Timing of Group Membership Disclosure
Golebiowska, E. A. (2001) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00099 · Cited by 9
Mistaken Inferences from Advertising Conversations: A Modest Research Agenda
Johar, G. V. (2016) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1217810 · Cited by 12
The Use of Statistical Heuristics in Everyday Inductive Reasoning
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.030 · Cited by 9
Self-citationInfluencing Probability Judgments by Manipulating the Accessibility of Sample Spaces
Hanita, M., Gavanski, I., & Fázio, R. H. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297238002 · Cited by 9
Chen, Z., Ren, D., Wang, Z., Gao, L., Shi, Y., Liu, H., & Yang, T. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102185 · Cited by 13
Judge, S., Goodson, B. M., & Stefaniak, C. M. (2024) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12936 · Cited by 14
The Effect of Information Design on Cognitive Processing of Website Navigation
Hsieh, T., Lo, H., Hu, H., & Chang, C. (2014) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20568 · Cited by 8
Improving judgment and decision making through communication and representation
Sedlmeier, P., & Hilton, D. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015684.015 · Cited by 8
Henry, E., & Peytcheva, M. (2019) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-52582 · Cited by 10
Cao, J., & Coram, P. J. (2020) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/ijau.12179 · Cited by 8
Using narratives and numbers in performance prediction: Attitudes, confidence, and validity
Niessen, A. S. M., Kausel, E. E., & Neumann, M. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12364 · Cited by 10
Coladonato, R., Bianchi, M., Case, F. M., & Carnaghi, A. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2841 · Cited by 8
Tracing Cognition with Assessment Center Simulations: Using Technology to See in the Dark
Guidry, B. W., Rupp, D. E., & Lanik, M. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7681-8_11 · Cited by 8
Value-based standards guide sexism inferences for self and others
Mitamura, C., Erickson, L., & Devine, P. G. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.006 · Cited by 8
“Finally, even if low IMS people attended to the potentially sexist behaviors and found them unacceptable, the extraneous information in Study 3 may have diluted the impact of the behaviors (Nisbett et al., 1981), making them less salient or influential in their evaluation of the TA.”
BackgroundSupport Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.027 · Cited by 8
How Communicating Misleading Information Dilutes Public Understanding of Weight Loss Mechanisms
Gastil, J., & Marriott, R. W. (2018) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1504656 · Cited by 8
“In cognitive psychology, this phenomenon has been labeled the “dilution effect” (Nisbett et al., 1981).”
BackgroundSanborn, A. N., Noguchi, T., Tripp, J., & Stewart, N. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104110 · Cited by 8
“…two book bags Labella and Koehler (2004), Shanteau (1975), Troutman and Shanteau (1977), tasks that ask for predictions about the behavior of people Nisbett et al. (1981), Zukier (1982), tasks asking for consumers’ judgments of products Meyvis and Janiszewski (2002), and even perceptual tasks…”
BackgroundTHE EARLY DETECTION OF DEPRESSION FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES
Holleran, S. E. (2010) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8
Additional Thoughts on Conversational and Motivational Sources of the Dilution Effect
Igou, E. R. (2007) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x06296473 · Cited by 7
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.034 · Cited by 7
The Effects of Decision-Aid Design on Auditor Performance in Internal Control Evaluation Tasks
Murthy, U. S., & Wheeler, P. R. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-51739 · Cited by 7
Chen, T., Simon, M., Kim, J., & Poploskie, B. (2015) · New England journal of entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/neje-18-01-2015-b004 · Cited by 7
“A third and final diagnostic error could occur when individuals underestimate the diagnostic value of a given cue (Nisbett, Zukier, and Lemley, 1981).”
An Overview of the Field of Political Psychology
Iyengar, S. (1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-002 · Cited by 8
Decision Making in Presidential Primaries
Popkin, S. L. (1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-017 · Cited by 8
Understanding teacher judgments of student motivation: The role of (un-)available cues
Beck, J., Dutke, S., & Utesch, T. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102029 · Cited by 7
The asymmetrical force of persuasive knowledge across the positive–negative divide
Arnestad, M. N., & Selart, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01324 · Cited by 6
“There are many identified factors in the execution of a persuasion attempt that may make the effort seem heavy-handed or transparent, and thus elicit and increase persuasion knowledge and coping.”
BackgroundMitigating the Dilution Effect in Auditors' Judgments Using a Frequency Response Mode
Eilifsen, A., Kochetova, N., & Messier, W. F. (2019) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-52467 · Cited by 6
“The perceptual approach finds its basis in the early work of Nisbett et al. (1981) and Zukier (1982)”
The Impact of Group Discussion on the Theory-Perseverance Bias
Wright, E. F., Christie, S. D., Johnson, R. W., & Stoffer, E. S. (1996) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9923031 · Cited by 6
Attention and attribute overlap in preferential choice
Bhatia, S. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1174720 · Cited by 6
When does making detailed predictions make predictions worse?
Kelly, T. F., & Simmons, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000204 · Cited by 5
Sandy, C., Rusconi, P., & Li, S. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF) · doi:10.1109/cybconf.2017.7985764 · Cited by 6
“For instance, is the influence of the profile picture stronger when it is the only mentioned component in the credibility judgement or is its influence decreased in the presence of other components such as the content, along the lines of a dilution effect [31]? One further problem is that the codes do not indicate whe…”
Information and Electoral Attitudes
Ansolabehere, S. D., & Iyengar, S. (1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-015 · Cited by 5
Rakow, T., Vincent, C. A., Bull, K., & Harvey, N. (2005) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x05276849 · Cited by 6
Lalwani, A. K. (2006) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 6
Gebotys, R. J., & Claxton-Oldfield, S. P. (1989) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350030304 · Cited by 6
Chalabaëv, A. (2006) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 6
Bloomfield, R. J., Libby, R., & Nelson, M. W. (1998) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.132149 · Cited by 6
Bloomfield, R. J., Nelson, M. W., & Smith, S. D. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.566801 · Cited by 6
Gardner, A. K., Costa, P., & Willis, R. E. (2022) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.013 · Cited by 5
Revising mental representations of faces based on new diagnostic information
Klein, S. A. W., Hutchings, R. J., & Todd, A. R. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104916 · Cited by 5
Wahlers, D. E., Hart, W., & Lambert, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104613 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- The New School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nisbett, Richard E.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-277
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171421397
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 26.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- dilution effect, diagnostic information, prediction, similarity judgments, stereotypes, individuating information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review