Cited by 526Software Engineering ResearchTeaching and Learning ProgrammingVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs

Pennington, Nancy·1987·Cognitive Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90007-7

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hayes, 1977, Psychological differences among problem isomorphs, Vol. 2
  2. Pennington, 1985, Cognitive components of expertise in computer programming: A review of the literature, Psychological Documents, 15
  3. Rumelhardt, 1980, A reply to Black and Wilensky, Cognitive Science, 4, 313
  4. Stein, 1979, An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children, Vol. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pennington, N.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Pennington, Nancy
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
295-341
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154671002
Cited by
526
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
32.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
program comprehension, mental representation, programming knowledge, control flow, functional relationships, goal hierarchy, expert programmers, task goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review