Cited by 195Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Sleep studies on a 90-minute day

Carskadon, Mary A, Dement, William C·1975·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

After 2 adaptation and 2 baseline all-night sleep recordings, 5 normal young adult subjects (3 males) were placed on a schedule alternating 60 min of wakefulness and 30 min of sleep for 5 1/3 24-h periods. A 2-day recovery period followed. One male subject (MA15) was later placed on the identical protocol with the exception that he was allotted periods of 75 min of wakefulness and 15 min of sleep during the experimental period. One male narcolepsy-cataplexy patient was placed on the 60-30 schedule for 48 h. All subjects showed REM sleep during the schedule manipulation. REMM sleep occurred within 10 min of sleep onset (SOREMP) on 79 of 110 REM sleep occasions in the normals, on all 29 REM episodes in MA15, and on 16 of 17 REM periods in the narcoleptic. In the normals, REM sleep showed a tendency to recur on alternate 90-min cycles, while in the narcoleptic REM recurred on consecutive periods. Compared to baseline, REM sleep 24 h was decreased in the normals and increased in the narcoleptic. Time spent in slow wave sleep and stage 2 was also reduced in the normal subjects on the 90-min schedule, and stage 1 sleep time was increased. Peak sleep times for the 5 normals occurred between 09.00 and 12.30 and lowest sleep times from 21.00 to 02.00. During the first recovery night, sleep times ranged from 11.5 to 18.5 h, including significant increases of slow wave sleep and REM sleep. Except for SOREMPs, no signs of the narcolepsy-cataplexy syndrome were seen in any of the normal subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90004-8

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carskadon, M. A., & Dement, W. C.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-08
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
145-155
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974547771
Cited by
194
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
REM sleep, REM sleep onset, sleep timing, narcolepsy type 1, slow-wave sleep, sleep stages, sleep deprivation recovery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Electrooculography, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Time Factors, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review