Cited by 31Spaceflight effects on biologyImmunotoxicology and immune responsesStress Responses and Cortisol

Effect of hindlimb suspension simulation of microgravity on in vitro immunological responses*1

NASH, P·1991·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

The effects of microgravity on the immune system are largely unknown, but understanding such effects becomes increasingly important as space exploration continues and mission duration increases. Reductions in postflight human T cell reactivity to mitogens is well documented. Similar results have been obtained using a clinostat as an in vitro model of microgravity. In this study, a rat tail suspension model of weightlessness was used to examine in vitro lymphocyte proliferation in response to mitogens. Experiments were designed to uncover potential deficits in events related to proliferation including cell surface protein and IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) expression, interleukin-2 (IL-2) production, and accessory cells. Suspension of rats for 1 week led to a significant depression in [3H]thymidine incorporation by mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) but only a small decrease in the proliferation of lymph node lymphocytes and splenocytes. There were no changes in the percentages of cells expressing CD4, CD5, CD8 or immunoglobulin. Moreover, no changes in IL-2 production or IL-2R expression were observed. More esterase-positive macrophages were detected in all lymphatic tissues of suspended rats, but there was no corresponding increase in the percentage of cells bearing the macrophage markers OX41 or OX42. This increase in the number of macrophages may be related to the observed suppression of lymphocyte proliferation. The tissue specificity of the decrease in mitogen activation indicates that there may be a compartmentalized response in the rats tested in the hindlimb suspension model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90384-7

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NASH, P.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
NASH, P
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-08
Volume
195
Issue
2
Pages
353-360
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998288608
Cited by
31
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
microgravity, hindlimb unloading, lymphocyte proliferation, mitogen stimulation, T cell response, interleukin-2, interleukin-2 receptor, macrophages, lymphocyte subsets, immunosuppression, spaceflight immunology, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Gravitation, Hindlimb, Hydrocortisone, Immunity, Interleukin-2, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Lymphocyte Activation, Macrophages, Male, Organ Size, Rats, Inbred Strains, Restraint, Physical, Receptors, Interleukin-2, Lymphocyte Subsets, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review