Cited by 11Spaceflight effects on biologyEffects of Radiation ExposureImmunotoxicology and immune responses

The combined effects of reduced weightbearing and ionizing radiation on splenic lymphocyte population and function

Open access
Sanzari, Jenine K., Wilson, Jolaine M., Wagner, Erika B., Kennedy, Ann R.·2011·International Journal of Radiation Biology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effects of radiation +/- hypogravity on immunologic function were investigated using the Partial Weight Suspension (PWS) model ( Wagner et al. 2010 ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice were exposed to 0.5, 1, or 2 Gray (Gy) dose of gamma radiation and then placed in the PWS system for 4, 24, 48 hours, or 4 days. Spleens were excised and white blood cells were prepared for flow cytometry analyses. RESULTS: The combination of PWS + radiation (1 and 2 Gy doses only) resulted in decreased cell viability at the 24 h (∼16% decrease), 48 h (∼20% decrease), and 4 day (∼20% decrease) time points, compared to the PWS (no radiation) and no treatment (non-suspended, non-irradiated) groups. The T lymphocyte (thymus-derived) population increased by ∼10% (24 h, 48 h, and 4 day time points), while the B lymphocyte (bursal or bone marrow-derived) population decreased by ∼10% (at all time points examined), when mice were exposed to PWS + radiation (2 Gy dose only), compared to the PWS or no treatment groups. T cell activation was observed in the PWS group and the 0.5 Gy +/- PWS groups at the 4 and 24 h time points, compared to the no treatment group. However, T cell activation was significantly suppressed (∼85%) at the acute time points in the 2 Gy +/- PWS groups, comparable to the no treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Ionizing radiation in the absence and presence of simulated hypogravity results in acute lymphocyte dysfunction and compromised immune response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09553002.2011.595875

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of synergistic effects of radiation combined with spaceflight stressors indicate increased susceptibility to infection and delayed wound healing.

    “Additionally, studies of the synergistic effects of radiation combined with the unusual set of stressors experienced in spaceflight-microgravity, isolation and emotional stress-indicate an increased susceptibility to infection and delayed wound healing (Sanzari et al. 2011).”

    From Radiation environment for future human exploration on the surface of Mars: the current understanding based on MSL/RAD dose measurements (2021) · cites this paper as Sanzari et al. 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that radiation combined with reduced weightbearing harmed splenic lymphocyte function in mice and may contribute to immune compromise during spaceflight. The paper does not report increased infection susceptibility or delayed wound healing, and it did not test isolation or emotional stress. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanzari, J. K., Wilson, J. M., Wagner, E. B., & Kennedy, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Ann R.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Biology
Published
2011-07-19
Volume
87
Issue
10
Pages
1033-1038
ISSN
  • 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3095
OpenAlex
W1964992885
Cited by
11
References
29
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009677)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
ionizing radiation, gamma radiation, splenocytes, T cells, B cells, T cell activation, lymphocyte dysfunction, immunosuppression, spaceflight immunology
MeSH terms
Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Flow Cytometry, Lymphocyte Activation, Lymphocytes, Radiation Injuries, Experimental, Radiation, Ionizing, Spleen, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review