Cited by 156Multi-Criteria Decision MakingOptimization and Mathematical ProgrammingDecision Support System Applications

A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment

Open access
Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., Vahdani, B.·2012·Applied Mathematical Modelling

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-ANP require many tedious pairwise comparisons.

    “However, Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-ANP have similar drawbacks, requiring many tedious pairwise comparisons [40,41].”

    From Cost Overrun Risk Assessment and Prediction in Construction Projects: A Bayesian Network Classifier Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    Section 3.1 (ANP; page unavailable) describes repeated pairwise comparisons, and Section 5.2 (Discussion; page unavailable) calls manipulations in conventional fuzzy ANP comparisons “boring.” The copy does not establish that fuzzy AHP shares this drawback, so it supports the fuzzy-ANP part but not the claim about both methods. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J.F. Seydel, D.L. Olson, An AHP-based system to support construction bidding with multiple objectives, in: Proceedings DSI, Miami, November, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Karaj (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • University of Zanjan (IR)
Corresponding author
Ebrahimnejad, S.
Venue
Applied Mathematical Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
4197-4217
ISSN
0307-904X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966601769
Cited by
156
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Mathematical Modelling (publishedVersion)
Funders
Islamic Azad University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
construction project selection, group decision making, fuzzy analytic network process, fuzzy VIKOR, compromise ranking, multi-criteria decision making, risk preferences, expert decision-making, interdependent criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review