The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study
Open accessAbstract
Part I (Mak et al., 1987, J. Biomechanics 20, 703-714) presented the theoretical solutions for the biphasic indentation of articular cartilage under creep and stress-relaxation conditions. In this study, using the creep solution, we developed an efficient numerical algorithm to compute all three material coefficients of cartilage in situ on the joint surface from the indentation creep experiment. With this method we determined the average values of the aggregate modulus. Poisson's ratio and permeability for young bovine femoral condylar cartilage in situ to be HA = 0.90 MPa, vs = 0.39 and k = 0.44 x 10(-15) m4/Ns respectively, and those for patellar groove cartilage to be HA = 0.47 MPa, vs = 0.24, k = 1.42 x 10(-15) m4/Ns. One surprising finding from this study is that the in situ Poisson's ratio of cartilage (0.13-0.45) may be much less than those determined from measurements performed on excised osteochondral plugs (0.40-0.49) reported in the literature. We also found the permeability of patellar groove cartilage to be several times higher than femoral condyle cartilage. These findings may have important implications on understanding the functional behavior of cartilage in situ and on methods used to determine the elastic moduli of cartilage using the indentation experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optical and mechanical determination of poisson's ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage
Jurvelin, J. S., Buschmann, M. D., & Hunziker, E. B. (1997) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00133-9 · Cited by 344
Mechanical Properties of Natural Cartilage and Tissue-Engineered Constructs
Little, C. J., Bawolin, N. K., & Chen, X. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0572 · Cited by 314
Biomechanics of Articular Cartilage and Determination of Material Properties
LU, X. L., & MOW, V. C. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31815cb1fc · Cited by 253
Self-citationStrategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair
Izadifar, Z., Chen, X., & Kulyk, W. (2012) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb3040799 · Cited by 203
Computational aspects in mechanical modeling of the articular cartilage tissue
Mohammadi, H., Mequanint, K., & Herzog, W. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411912470239 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Mow, V. C., Gibbs, M. C., Lai, W. M., Zhu, W. B., & Athanasiou, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 853-861
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969711196
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(89)90069-9
- The paper
- Mow, V. C., Gibbs, M. C., Lai, W. M., Zhu, W. B., & Athanasiou, K. A. (1989). Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(89)90069-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.