The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate
Open accessAbstract
Diffuse brain injuries resulting from non-impact rotational acceleration are investigated with the aid of physical models of the skull-brain structure. These models provide a unique insight into the relationship between the kinematics of head motion and the associated deformation of the surrogate brain material. Human and baboon skulls filled with optically transparent surrogate brain tissue are subjected to lateral rotations like those shown to produce diffuse injury to the deep white matter in the brain of the baboon. High-speed cinematography captures the deformations of the grids embedded within the surrogate brain tissue during the applied load. The overall deformation pattern is compared to the pathological portrait of diffuse brain injury as determined from animal studies and autopsy reports. Shear strain and pathology spatial distributions mirror each other. Load levels and resulting surrogate brain tissue deformations are related from one species to the other. Increased primate brain mass magnified the strain amplified without significantly altering the spatial distribution. An empirically-derived value for a critical shear strain associated with the onset of severe diffuse axonal injury in primates is determined, assuming constitutive similarity between baboon and human brain tissue. The primate skull physical model data and the critical shear strain associated with the threshold for severe diffuse axonal injury were used to scale data obtained from previous studies to man, and thus derive a diffuse axonal injury tolerance for rotational acceleration for humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury
Johnson, V. E., Stewart, W., & Smith, D. H. (2013) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013 · Cited by 1,273
Margulies, S. S., & Thibault, K. L. (2000) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.1287160 · Cited by 306
Self-citationBiomechanical Analysis of Experimental Diffuse Axonal Injury
MEANEY, D. F., SMITH, D. H., SHREIBER, D. I., BAIN, A. C., MILLER, R. T., ROSS, D. T., & GENNARELLI, T. A. (1995) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1995.12.689 · Cited by 254
Self-citationMaxwell, W. L., Watt, C., Graham, D. I., & Gennarelli, T. A. (1993) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00334880 · Cited by 161
Self-citationA porcine model of traumatic brain injury via head rotational acceleration
Cullen, D. K., Harris, J. P., Browne, K. D., Wolf, J. A., Duda, J. E., Meaney, D. F., Margulies, S. S., & Smith, D. H. (2016) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_17 · Cited by 142
“To further establish links between macro- and micro-biomechanical features as well as to advance scaling to human injuries, the HYGE device has been used to subject physical models of the skull brain structures to identical loading conditions used to produce specific brain injuries in animals [63, 65, 66, 104, 126].”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Margulies, S. S., Thibault, L. E., & Gennarelli, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 823-836
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080090356
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90029-3
- The paper
- Margulies, S. S., Thibault, L. E., & Gennarelli, T. A. (1990). Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90029-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.