Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,036

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts

Open access
Bernheim, B.Douglas, Peleg, Bezalel, Whinston, Michael D·1987·Journal of Economic Theory

Abstract

In an important class of “noncooperative” environments, it is natural to assume that players can freely discuss their strategies, but cannot make binding commitments. In such cases, any meaningful agreement between the players must be self-enforcing. Although the Nash best-response property is a necessary condition for self-enforceability, it is not sufficient—it is in general possible for coalitions arrange plausible, mutually beneficial deviations from Nash agreements. We provide a stronger definition of self-enforceability, and label the class of efficient self-enforcing agreements “coalition-proof.”

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,036

Metadata

Authors
Bernheim, B. D., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D.
Venue
Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-06
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005516244
Cited by
1,036
References
1
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8
The paper
Bernheim, B. D., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D. (1987). Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.