Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes

Open access
Breckler, Steven J., Wiggins, Elizabeth C.·1989·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract

A distinction is made between affect and evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Affect refers to emotional responses and feelings engendered by an attitude object. Evaluation refers to thoughts, beliefs, and judgments about an attitude object. In Study 1, multiple measures of affect and evaluation were collected in six attitude domains. Estimates of the disattenuated correlation between affect and evaluation varied from .25 to .89, supporting discriminant validity of the distinction. Affect and evaluation were both correlated with a global measure of attitude, even when the effects of one were partialled from the other. Study 2 focused on the attitude domain of blood donation. The disattenuated correlation between affect and evaluation was .52. Affect, but not evaluation, was correlated with independent measures of mood. Self-reported behaviors relating to blood donation were more strongly related to affect than to evaluation. However, the relationship between affect and behavior diminished with increasing experience in donating blood. These results have important implications for theories of attitude structure, techniques of attitude measurement, and studies of attitude change and the attitude-behavior relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bagozzi, 1978, The construct validity of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude by analysis of covariance structures, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 9, 10.1207/s15327906mbr1301_2 · DOI
  2. Breckler, 1984, Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191, 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Buck, 1985, Prime Theory: An integrated view of motivation and emotion, Psychological Review, 92, 389, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.389 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fazio, 1981, Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency, Vol. 14, 161
  5. Fleming, 1967, Attitude: The history of a concept, Perspectives in American History, 1, 287
  6. Greenwald, 1982, Is any one in charge? Personalysis versus the principle of personal unity, Vol. 1, 151
  7. Hilgard, 1980, The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107, 10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  8. Insko, 1967, Triadic consistency: A statement of affective-cognitive-conative consistency, Psychological Review, 74, 361, 10.1037/h0020278 · DOI
  9. Katz, 1960, The functional approach to the study of attitudes, Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163, 10.1086/266945 · DOI
  10. Katz, 1959, A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change, Vol. 3, 423
  11. Kothandapani, 1971, Validation of feeling, belief, and intention to act as three components of attitude and their contribution to prediction of contraceptive behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 321, 10.1037/h0031448 · DOI
  12. Kramer, 1949, Dimensions of prejudice, Journal of Psychology, 27, 389, 10.1080/00223980.1949.9917434 · DOI
  13. Leventhal, 1984, A perceptual-motor theory of emotion, Vol. 17, 117
  14. Mann, 1959, The relationship between cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects of racial prejudice, Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 223, 10.1080/00224545.1959.9919309 · DOI
  15. McGuire, 1968, The nature of attitudes and attitude change, Vol. 3, 136
  16. McGuire, 1985, Attitudes and attitude change, Vol. 2, 233
  17. Millar, 1986, Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ostrom, 1969, The relationship between the affective, behavioral and cognitive components of attitude, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12, 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Oswalt, 1977, A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment, Transfusion, 17, 123, 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17277151916.x · DOI
  20. Piliavin, 1982, Addiction to altruism? Opponent-process theory and habitual blood donation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1200, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1200 · DOI
  21. Smith, 1947, The personal setting of public opinions: A study of attitudes toward Russia, Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 507, 10.1086/265884 · DOI
  22. Widaman, 1985, Hierarchically-nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data, Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1, 10.1177/014662168500900101 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wilson, 1986, Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: Analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249, 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90028-4 · DOI
  24. Woodmansee, 1967, Dimensions of verbal racial attitudes: Their identification and measurement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 240, 10.1037/h0025078 · DOI

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
253-271
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053956051
Cited by
383
References
3
FWCI
21.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-x
The paper
Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.