The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes
Open accessAbstract
A distinction is made between affect and evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Affect refers to emotional responses and feelings engendered by an attitude object. Evaluation refers to thoughts, beliefs, and judgments about an attitude object. In Study 1, multiple measures of affect and evaluation were collected in six attitude domains. Estimates of the disattenuated correlation between affect and evaluation varied from .25 to .89, supporting discriminant validity of the distinction. Affect and evaluation were both correlated with a global measure of attitude, even when the effects of one were partialled from the other. Study 2 focused on the attitude domain of blood donation. The disattenuated correlation between affect and evaluation was .52. Affect, but not evaluation, was correlated with independent measures of mood. Self-reported behaviors relating to blood donation were more strongly related to affect than to evaluation. However, the relationship between affect and behavior diminished with increasing experience in donating blood. These results have important implications for theories of attitude structure, techniques of attitude measurement, and studies of attitude change and the attitude-behavior relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Bagozzi, 1978, The construct validity of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude by analysis of covariance structures, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 9, 10.1207/s15327906mbr1301_2 · DOI
- Breckler, 1984, Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191, 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191 · DOI · Paper page
- Buck, 1985, Prime Theory: An integrated view of motivation and emotion, Psychological Review, 92, 389, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.389 · DOI · Paper page
- Fazio, 1981, Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency, Vol. 14, 161
- Fleming, 1967, Attitude: The history of a concept, Perspectives in American History, 1, 287
- Greenwald, 1982, Is any one in charge? Personalysis versus the principle of personal unity, Vol. 1, 151
- Hilgard, 1980, The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107, 10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Insko, 1967, Triadic consistency: A statement of affective-cognitive-conative consistency, Psychological Review, 74, 361, 10.1037/h0020278 · DOI
- Katz, 1960, The functional approach to the study of attitudes, Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163, 10.1086/266945 · DOI
- Katz, 1959, A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change, Vol. 3, 423
- Kothandapani, 1971, Validation of feeling, belief, and intention to act as three components of attitude and their contribution to prediction of contraceptive behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 321, 10.1037/h0031448 · DOI
- Kramer, 1949, Dimensions of prejudice, Journal of Psychology, 27, 389, 10.1080/00223980.1949.9917434 · DOI
- Leventhal, 1984, A perceptual-motor theory of emotion, Vol. 17, 117
- Mann, 1959, The relationship between cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects of racial prejudice, Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 223, 10.1080/00224545.1959.9919309 · DOI
- McGuire, 1968, The nature of attitudes and attitude change, Vol. 3, 136
- McGuire, 1985, Attitudes and attitude change, Vol. 2, 233
- Millar, 1986, Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270 · DOI · Paper page
- Ostrom, 1969, The relationship between the affective, behavioral and cognitive components of attitude, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12, 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Oswalt, 1977, A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment, Transfusion, 17, 123, 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17277151916.x · DOI
- Piliavin, 1982, Addiction to altruism? Opponent-process theory and habitual blood donation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1200, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1200 · DOI
- Smith, 1947, The personal setting of public opinions: A study of attitudes toward Russia, Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 507, 10.1086/265884 · DOI
- Widaman, 1985, Hierarchically-nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data, Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1, 10.1177/014662168500900101 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson, 1986, Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: Analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249, 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90028-4 · DOI
- Woodmansee, 1967, Dimensions of verbal racial attitudes: Their identification and measurement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 240, 10.1037/h0025078 · DOI
Cited by
The Role of Emotions in Marketing
Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070399272005 · Cited by 3,349
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164 · Cited by 1,812
Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457417 · Cited by 679
Marcus, G. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-271
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053956051
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor, 5966 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-x
- The paper
- Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.