The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
Self-citationBeven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
Self-citationEquifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?
Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J. F., Gupta, H. V., & Robinson, B. A. (2009) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y · Cited by 455
The Role of Expert Opinion in Environmental Modelling
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 · Cited by 413
Sivapalan, M., & Blöschl, G. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017896 · Cited by 353
Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile
Budds, J. (2009) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008 · Cited by 339
Relations between soil hydraulic properties and burn severity
Moody, J. A., Ebel, B. A., Nyman, P., Martin, D. A., Stoof, C., & McKinley, R. (2016) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf14062 · Cited by 122
Effect of growing watershed imperviousness on hydrograph parameters and peak discharge
Huang, H., Cheng, S., Wen, J., & Lee, J. (2008) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.6807 · Cited by 107
Parameter identification of the STICS crop model, using an accelerated formal MCMC approach
Dumont, B., Leemans, V., Mansouri, M., Bodson, B., Destain, J.-P., & Destain, M.-F. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.022 · Cited by 78
ML for Flood Forecasting at Scale
Nevo, S., Anisimov, V., Elidan, G., El-Yaniv, R., Giencke, P., Gigi, Y., Hassidim, A., Moshe, Z., Schlesinger, M., Shalev, G., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.09583 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Beven, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 157-172
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037825302
- Cited by
- 1,601
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.