Cited by 1,182RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cells

Kozak, Marilyn·1987·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Sequences flanking the AUG initiator codon influence its recognition by eukaryotic ribosomes. From a comparison of several hundred mRNA sequences, CCA/GCCAUGG emerged as the consensus sequence for initiation in higher eukaryotes. Systematic mutagenesis of a cloned preproinsulin gene confirmed the facilitating effect of A or G in position -3 (i.e. 3 nucleotides upstream from the AUG codon), C in positions -1 and -2, and G immediately following the AUG codon. The analysis of a new set of mutants now reveals that sequences slightly farther upstream are also influential, the optimal context for initiation being (GCC)GCCA/GCCAUGG. Possible mechanistic implications of the repeating GCC motif are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90418-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on the Kozak consensus.

    “Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on two factors [40,41]: (1) the Kozak consensus [42,43,44], and (2) the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure these essential translation initiation signals [9,41,45].”
  • The Kozak consensus for mammalian genes that enhances translation initiation is GCCRCCAUGG, where AUG is the start codon.

    “The Kozak consensus for mammalian genes that enhances translation initiation is GCCRCCAUGG [40,46], where AUG is the start codon.”
  • Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure essential translation initiation signals.

    “Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on two factors [40,41]: (1) the Kozak consensus [42,43,44], and (2) the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure these essential translation initiation signals [9,41,45].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozak, M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kozak, Marilyn
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-08
Volume
196
Issue
4
Pages
947-950
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065905166
Cited by
1,182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 33915)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
translation initiation, initiator codon, AUG codon, Kozak sequence, codon context, mammalian cells, mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Codon, Insulin, Mutation, Proinsulin, Protein Precursors, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review