Cited by 115Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Alexithymia—state or trait? One-year follow- up study of general hospital psychiatric consultation out-patients

Salminen, Jouko K., Saarijärvi, Simo, Ääirelä, Erkki, Tamminen, Tuula·1994·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

We carried out a 1-year follow-up study on 54 out of 80 general hospital psychiatric consultation out-patients. Alexithymic features were measured by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), and self-reported psychological distress with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Men were more alexithymic and distressed than women both at the baseline and at the follow-up evaluations. The degree of alexithymia in both genders remained consistent, whereas psychological distress decreased significantly in both genders during the follow-up period. Therefore we conclude that alexithymia presents a constant trait in psychiatric consultation out-patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90020-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alexithymia is generally conceptualised as a stable trait, though the temporal stability of its factors has been seen to differ, with difficulty identifying feelings and difficulty describing feelings increasing during depressive episodes.

    “Alexithymia is generally conceptualised as a stable construct (a trait) [84–86], though the temporal stability of the factors (difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings and externally orientated thinking) has been seen to differ, the former two to increase when patients are in depressive episodes [87].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salminen, J. K., Saarijärvi, S., Ääirelä, E., & Tamminen, T.
Affiliations
Social Insurance Institution (FI)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
681-685
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004538293
Cited by
115
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
alexithymia, trait versus state, psychological distress, sex differences, longitudinal follow-up, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Ambulatory Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Referral and Consultation, Sex Factors, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review