Cited by 129Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Alexithymia: A Systematic Review

Open access
Norman, Hilary, Marzano, Lisa, Coulson, Mark, Oskis, Andrea·2019·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Question Alexithymia has been found to be modifiable through treatment, with associated clinical benefits. Recent studies have begun to test the potential of mindfulness-based interventions to reduce alexithymia, using skills-based, group training to improve non-judgemental, present-moment awareness. The objective of this review therefore was to conduct a systematic synthesis to assess the current state of knowledge about the effect of mindfulness-based interventions on alexithymia to inform clinical practice. Study selection and analysis We carried out a systematic review of the literature and found four randomised controlled trials of the effect of mindfulness-based interventions on alexithymia, with a combined total of 460 participants. Findings A random-effects meta-analysis, combining study endpoint data, showed a statistically significant effect of mindfulness-based treatment on alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale) compared with the control group (mean difference=−5.28, 95% CI −9.28 to −1.28, p=0.010). Subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate sources of heterogeneity (I2=52%). Heterogeneity was reduced when the meta-analysis was restricted to interventions of a similar duration (3 months or less). Conclusions Findings from our study should be replicated in further research with larger samples; however, the results indicate that mindfulness-based interventions may be an effective treatment in reducing alexithymia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300029

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We would expect to see a reduction rather than an increase in ALX over time.

    “More importantly, we would expect to see a reduction rather than an increase in ALX over time (see Norman et al., 2019).”

    From Self-guided mindfulness and cognitive behavioural practices reduce anxiety in autistic adults: A pilot 8-month waitlist-controlled trial of widely available online tools. (2020) · cites this paper as Norman et al., 2019

    The Conclusions and clinical implications (p. 3) report that mindfulness-based interventions reduced alexithymia relative to controls at the end of the study period. This supports expecting a reduction in that setting, but not a general expectation that alexithymia will decrease over time without such an intervention. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • We found two systematic reviews on interventional studies of psychological therapy, but they are only thematized on dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and mindfulness-based interventions.

    “We found two systematic reviews on interventional studies of psychological therapy [35,36], but they are only thematized on dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and mindfulness-based interventions.”
  • The review excluded non-psychological studies and mindfulness and DBT because there were already systematic reviews on such therapies improving alexithymia.

    “We excluded non-psychological studies and also mindfulness and DBT since there were already systematic reviews on such therapies improving alexithymia [35,36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]36. de la Fuente Arias M, Justo CF , Granados MS. Efectos de un programa de meditación (mindfulness) en la medida de la alexitimia y las habilidades sociales. Psicothema 2010;22:369-75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, H., Marzano, L., Coulson, M., & Oskis, A.
Affiliations
Middlesex University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Norman, Hilary
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-08-04
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2883429522
Cited by
128
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, alexithymia, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, treatment effects, group training, present-moment awareness
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Affective Symptoms, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review