Cited by 496Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Composition Measurement Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report

Schoeller, Dale A.·1995·Metabolism

Abstract

Development of the doubly-labeled water method has made it possible to test the validity of dietary intake instruments for the measurement of energy intake. Comparisons of measured energy expenditure with energy intake from either weighed or estimated dietary records against energy expenditure have indicated that obese subjects, female endurance athletes, and adolescents underestimate habitual and actual energy intake. Individual underestimates of 50% are not uncommon. Even in non-obese adults, where bias is minimal, the standard deviation for individual errors in energy intake approaches 20%. Two investigations of the validity of self-reported dietary records for measuring change in dietary intake also indicate large underestimates of the actual change. Because of bias and imprecision, self-reported energy intakes should be interpreted with caution unless independent methods of assessing their validity are included in the experimental design.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90204-x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bingham, 1987, The dietary assessment of individuals: Methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations, Nutr Abst Rev (Ser A), 57, 705

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 496

Metadata

Authors
Schoeller, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Schoeller, Dale A.
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
44
Issue
2 Suppl 2
Pages
18-22
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089295051
Cited by
496
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30dk026678-20)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-26678, DK-30031, R01DK030031)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
energy intake, self-report, dietary assessment validity, doubly labeled water, energy expenditure, underestimation bias, weighed dietary records, obesity, female endurance athletes, adolescents, measurement error
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Energy Intake, Child, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Obesity, Exercise, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review