The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence that prenatal care improves birth outcomes. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE data base was searched for appropriate studies for the years 1966-1994; a review of published studies was also conducted. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Published observational and experimental studies of prenatal care that met specified criteria were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were graded based on the system used by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Data were assessed using established criteria for the evaluation of prenatal interventions: temporal relationship, biologic plausibility, consistency, alternative explanations, dose-response, strength of association, and cessation effects. Current evidence did not satisfy the criteria. CONCLUSION: Prenatal care has not been demonstrated to improve birth outcomes conclusively. However, policymakers deciding on funding for prenatal care must consider these findings in the context of prenatal care's overall benefits and potential cost-effectiveness. Cost-effective reductions in low birth weight deliveries may be beyond the statistical powers of detection of current studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racism, Sexism, and Social Class: Implications for Studies of Health, Disease, and Well-being
Krieger, N., Rowley, D. L., Herman, A. A., Avery, B., & Phillips, M. T. (1993) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30666-4 · Cited by 956
Wadhwa, P. D., Sandman, C. A., Porto, M., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Garite, T. J. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90016-c · Cited by 794
Lobel, M., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Scrimshaw, S. C. M. (1992) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.11.1.32 · Cited by 393
Cited by
The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes
Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. (2014) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/00333549141291s206 · Cited by 3,861
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907
Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective
Lu, M. C., & Halfon, N. (2003) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1022537516969 · Cited by 979
Goldenberg, R. L., & Rouse, D. J. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807303390506 · Cited by 758
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- FISCELLA, K.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-479
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980642910
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00408-6
- The paper
- FISCELLA, K. (1995). Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00408-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
