The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, studies have shown that regression estimates produce ex ante forecasts that are often less accurate than forecasts from 'unit weights' models.”
From Illusions in Regression Analysis (2011) · cites this paper as Einhorn and Hogarth (1975)
Citations
Cites
Gulliksen, H. O. (1950) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1037/13240-000 · Cited by 2,184
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Sargan, J. D., & Zellner, A. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344559 · Cited by 1,938
Linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0037613 · Cited by 1,887
Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-x · Cited by 1,838
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Aigner, D. J., & Zellner, A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284674 · Cited by 1,687
Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical.
Sawyer, J. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0023624 · Cited by 594
Theory of Psychological Measurement
(1965) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1965.0018 · Cited by 382
Weighting Systems for Linear Functions of Correlated Variables When There is no Dependent Variable
Wilks, S. S. (1938) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02287917 · Cited by 275
Schmidt, F. L. (1971) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447103100310 · Cited by 228
Man-Computer Cooperation in Decisions Requiring Common Sense
Yntema, D. B., & Torgerson, W. S. (1961) · IRE transactions on human factors in electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe2.1961.4503294 · Cited by 180
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sluckin, 1956, Combining criteria of occupational success: Part II, Occupational Psychology, 30, 57
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 672
What Produces a Hidden Economy? An International Cross Section Analysis
Frey, B. S., & Weck‐Hannemann, H. (1983) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1058719 · Cited by 36
Human information processing and its relevance to accounting: A laboratory study
Miguel, J. G. S. (1976) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(76)90039-8 · Cited by 36
The majority rule in individual decision making
Zhang, J., Hsee, C. K., & Xiao, Z. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.004 · Cited by 35
Improving Experts' Wine Quality Judgments: Two Heads Are Better than One
Ashton, R. H. (2011) · Journal of Wine Economics · doi:10.1017/s1931436100001577 · Cited by 34
Using PageRank for non-personalized default rankings in dynamic markets
Scholz, M., Pfeiffer, J., & Rothlauf, F. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.022 · Cited by 33
Multiple-criteria robust interactive decision analysis (MCRID) for optimizing public policies
Moskowitz, H., Preckel, P. V., & Yang, A. (1992) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90224-w · Cited by 34
Liu, H., Jazayeri, E., & Dadi, G. B. (2017) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001292 · Cited by 33
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (1995) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00336.x · Cited by 33
Andrews, R. L., & Manrai, A. K. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379803500206 · Cited by 32
Thorstad, D. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198886143.001.0001 · Cited by 36
Morssinkhof, S., Wouters, M. J. F., & Warlop, L. (2011) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.02.002 · Cited by 31
Fechner, H. B., Schooler, L. J., & Pachur, T. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.003 · Cited by 35
A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy
Eils, L. C., & John, R. S. (1980) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90067-7 · Cited by 30
A Constrained Linear Estimator for Multiple Regression
Davis‐Stober, C. P., Dana, J. D., & Budescu, D. V. (2010) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9162-8 · Cited by 29
Advice taking under uncertainty: The impact of genuine advice versus arbitrary anchors on judgment
Hütter, M., & Fiedler, K. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103829 · Cited by 28
Horowitz, I. (1995) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00039-9 · Cited by 28
Koonce, L. L., & Lipe, M. G. (2016) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12235 · Cited by 27
Campion, M. A., & Stevens, M. J. (1991) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf01126707 · Cited by 27
Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment
(2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195162293.001.0001.002.002 · Cited by 27
Research Interest: another undisclosed (and redundant) algorithm by ResearchGate
Copiello, S. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03124-w · Cited by 26
Kallas, Z., & Roig, J. M. G. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.11.006 · Cited by 26
Multi-attribute utility models as cognitive search engines
Analytis, P. P., Kothiyal, A., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006781 · Cited by 26
An Experimental Investigation of the Positive and Negative Effects of Mutual Observation
Bloomfield, R. J., & Hales, J. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.331 · Cited by 26
Validation and statistical power: Implications for applied research.
Cascio, W. F., Valenzi, E. R., & Silbey, V. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.63.5.589 · Cited by 26
Rupp, D. E., Song, Q. C., & Strah, N. (2020) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2020.19 · Cited by 27
The Single Client Resonance Model: Beyond Rigor and Relevance
Gill, G. (2008) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/449 · Cited by 25
Metacognitive myopia and the overutilization of misleading advice
Fiedler, K., Hütter, M., Schott, M., & Kutzner, F. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2109 · Cited by 25
Interdependent Criteria in Utility Analysis
Farquhar, P. H. (1978) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46368-6_8 · Cited by 25
On measurement, valuewise independence and linear models
King, W. R. (1983) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90046-4 · Cited by 25
Ravinder, H. V. (1992) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960050302 · Cited by 24
External auditors' evaluation of the internal audit function: An empirical investigation
Desai, R., Desai, V., Libby, T., & Srivastava, R. P. (2017) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2016.12.001 · Cited by 24
Assimakis, P. D., & Dillbeck, M. C. (1995) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3c.1171 · Cited by 24
Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory
Humphreys, P. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1276-8_13 · Cited by 24
Conflicting Objectives in Decisions.
Smith, A. F. M., Bell, D. E., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344505 · Cited by 24
New Perspectives on the Validity of the GRE ® General Test for Predicting Graduate School Grades
Klieger, D. M., Cline, F. A., Holtzman, S. L., Minsky, J., & Lorenz, F. (2014) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12026 · Cited by 23
How Good Are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.033 · Cited by 24
Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.003.0007 · Cited by 24
Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way
Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.003.0008 · Cited by 23
Hurley, W. J., & Lior, D. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00226-0 · Cited by 22
Designing Pareto optimal stimuli for multiattribute choice experiments
Krieger, A. Μ., & Green, P. E. (1991) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00664220 · Cited by 22
Predictions of Individual Change Recovered With Latent Class or Random Coefficient Growth Models
Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2014) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915189 · Cited by 22
Adelman, L., Sticha, P. J., & Donnell, M. L. (1984) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90023-0 · Cited by 22
Artificial intelligence expert systems for clinical diagnosis: Are they worth the effort?
Carroll, B. (1987) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830320404 · Cited by 22
The Accuracy of Individual and Group Forecasts from Business Outlook Surveys
Zarnowitz, V. (1982) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w1053 · Cited by 22
Knowing the crowd within: Metacognitive limits on combining multiple judgments
Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.002 · Cited by 21
A More Consistent Application of the RNR Model
Hamilton, Z. K., Campagna, M. F., Tollefsbol, E., van Wormer, J. G., & Barnoski, R. (2017) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854816678032 · Cited by 23
Resistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.019 · Cited by 24
The effect of having too much choice
Scheibehenne, B. (2008) · doi:10.18452/15740 · Cited by 22
Justice Judgments: Individual Self-Insight and Between- and Within-Person Consistency
German, H., Fortin, M., & Read, D. (2015) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2014.0031 · Cited by 20
On the relative importance of linear model and human judge(s) in combined forecasting
Seifert, M., & Hadida, A. L. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.003 · Cited by 20
Davis, K. R., & Sauser, W. I., Jr. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00692.x · Cited by 20
The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.015 · Cited by 20
Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.003.0010 · Cited by 20
Leung, P. K. (1978) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830230509 · Cited by 20
Additional considerations with regard to multiple regression and equal weighting
Keren, G. B., & Newman, J. R. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90010-7 · Cited by 20
A multiagent multiattribute approach for conflict resolution in acid rain impact mitigation
Anandalingam, G. “. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.44030 · Cited by 20
von der Heidt, T., & Scott, D. R. (2007) · Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) · Cited by 19
A Geometric Analysis of When Fixed Weighting Schemes Will Outperform Ordinary Least Squares
Davis‐Stober, C. P. (2011) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9229-1 · Cited by 19
Cuzán, A. G., & Bundrick, C. M. (2009) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpp008 · Cited by 19
Nonisomorphism, Shadow Features and Imputed Preferences
Holbrook, M. B., Moore, W. L., Dodgen, G. N., & Havlena, W. J. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.215 · Cited by 19
Why Do Simple Heuristics Perform Well in Choices with Binary Attributes?
Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2013) · Decision Analysis · doi:10.1287/deca.2013.0281 · Cited by 19
Perceptual Veridicality in Esthetic Communication: A Model, General Procedure, and Illustration
Holbrook, M. B., & Bertges, S. A. (1981) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365028100800401 · Cited by 19
Patient or Physician Preferences for Decision Analysis
Heckerling, P. S., Verp, M. S., & Albert, N. M. (1999) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9901900109 · Cited by 19
4. Human Decision Processes: Heuristics and Task Structure
Kleinmuntz, D. N. (1987) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62308-0 · Cited by 19
A cross-validated comparison of five models used to predict graduate admissions committee decisions.
Wallace, M. J., & Schwab, D. P. (1976) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.61.5.559 · Cited by 19
Ridge regression and some alternative weighting techniques: A comment on Darlington.
Morris, J. D. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.91.1.203 · Cited by 19
Defining and Improving the Accuracy of Macroeconomic Forecasts: Contributions from a VAR ModelPreprint
Webb, R. H., & Lupoletti, W. M. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2120234 · Cited by 19
“Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When They Work “Well” with Binary Cues
Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_10 · Cited by 18
Self-citationFeedback weakens the attraction effect in repeated choices
Ahn, S., Kim, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (2014) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9281-6 · Cited by 18
Prediction is Local: The Benefits of Risk Assessment Optimization
Hamilton, Z. K., Kigerl, A., & Kowalski, M. A. (2021) · Justice quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2021.1894215 · Cited by 22
Theory-Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.044 · Cited by 18
Self-insight into the cognitive processing of financial information
Wright, W. F. (1977) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(77)90022-8 · Cited by 18
Rogers, T., Colvin, C., & Chiera, B. (2014) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2567574.2567629 · Cited by 18
Changes in Use of Alcohol, Marijuana, and Services by Adolescents With Serious Emotional Disturbance
Greenbaum, P. E., & Dedrick, R. F. (2007) · Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/10634266070150010301 · Cited by 17
de Baca, T. C., Sotomayor‐Peterson, M., Smith‐Castro, V., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022113513068 · Cited by 18
Generalizing the Sensitivity Conditions in an Overall Index of Product Quality
Kopalle, P. K., & Hoffman, D. L. (1992) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209279 · Cited by 17
The impact of feedback on inter-rater agreement and self insight in performance evaluation decisions
Luckett, P. F., & Hirst, M. K. (1989) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(89)90007-x · Cited by 17
A predictive-validity-based procedure for choosing between regression and equal weights
Cattin, P. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90007-7 · Cited by 17
Reliability of actual and predicted judgments across time
Balzer, W. K., Rohrbaugh, J., & Murphy, K. R. (1983) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90142-3 · Cited by 17
Lee, Cadogan, and Chamberlain: an excellent point . . . But what about that iceberg?
Rigdon, E. E. (2013) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-013-0034-0 · Cited by 16
Forecasting Elections from Voters' Perceptions of Candidates' Ability to Handle Issues
Graefe, A., & Armstrong, J. S. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1764 · Cited by 16
A Comparison of Factor Weighting Methods in Job Evaluation: Implications for Compensation Systems
Davis, K. R., & Sauser, W. I., Jr. (1993) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/009102609302200107 · Cited by 16
Cognitive science and decision making research in accounting
Dillard, J. (1984) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(84)90018-7 · Cited by 16
Multi-attribute utility analysis using the promes approach
Roth, P. L. (1994) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02230988 · Cited by 16
On the Robustness of a Class of Naive Estimators
Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1979) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167900300411 · Cited by 16
Mousseau, V. (1992) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/1992260403671 · Cited by 16
Rationality in systems engineering: Beyond calculation or political action
Clausing, D. P., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.20102 · Cited by 15
Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J. A., Arriaza, M., & Nekhay, O. (2011) · Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales · doi:10.7201/earn.2006.11.03 · Cited by 15
Expert systems and behavioral decision research
von Winterfeldt, D. (1988) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(88)90009-7 · Cited by 15
The weight of organizational factors on heuristics
Barberà-Mariné, M. G., Cannavacciuolo, L., Ippolito, A., Ponsiglione, C., & Zollo, G. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2017-0574 · Cited by 14
Dana, J. D., & Dawes, R. M. (2007) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09084280701280379 · Cited by 14
Homo Heuristicus and the Bias–Variance Dilemma
Brighton, H., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230360792_4 · Cited by 14
Spengler, P. M. (2000) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.47.3.342 · Cited by 14
Null-hypothesis significance tests in behavioral and management research: We can do better
Schwab, A., & Starbuck, W. H. (2009) · Research methodology in strategy and management · doi:10.1108/s1479-8387(2009)0000005002 · Cited by 14
McCauley, C. R. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.46.12.1287 · Cited by 14
BARGAINING WITH SHARED INFORMATION*
Chatterjee, K., & Ulvila, J. W. (1982) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb00157.x · Cited by 14
Mumpower, J. L. (1988) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62183-4 · Cited by 14
College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T., Liang, Y., Qin, Z., & College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, N. U. O. D. T. (2019) · Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics · doi:10.21629/jsee.2019.03.11 · Cited by 13
The Structure of Social Influence in Recommender Networks
Analytis, P. P., Barkoczi, D., Lorenz-Spreen, P., & Herzog, S. M. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380020 · Cited by 13
Faut-il croire le classement de Shangaï ?
Billaut, J., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010) · Revue de la régulation · doi:10.4000/regulation.9016 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- INSEAD (FR)
- ORCID
- Hogarth, Robin M.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-192
- ISSN
- 0030-5073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107426741
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 30.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- composite variables, component weighting, linear regression, predictive power, decision-making, sample size effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review