Cited by 673Statistical Methods and ApplicationsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingForecasting Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unit weighting schemes for decision making

Einhorn, Hillel J., Hogarth, Robin M.·1975·Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Theory of Mental Tests
Gulliksen, H. O. (1950) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1037/13240-000 · Cited by 2,184
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Sargan, J. D., & Zellner, A. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344559 · Cited by 1,938
Linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0037613 · Cited by 1,887
Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-x · Cited by 1,838
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Aigner, D. J., & Zellner, A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284674 · Cited by 1,687
Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical.
Sawyer, J. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0023624 · Cited by 594
Theory of Psychological Measurement
(1965) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1965.0018 · Cited by 382
Weighting Systems for Linear Functions of Correlated Variables When There is no Dependent Variable
Wilks, S. S. (1938) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02287917 · Cited by 275
The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology
Schmidt, F. L. (1971) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447103100310 · Cited by 228
Man-Computer Cooperation in Decisions Requiring Common Sense
Yntema, D. B., & Torgerson, W. S. (1961) · IRE transactions on human factors in electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe2.1961.4503294 · Cited by 180

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Sluckin, 1956, Combining criteria of occupational success: Part II, Occupational Psychology, 30, 57

Sorted by citations

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Heuristic decision making
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 · Cited by 4,037
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,247
The Affect Heuristic
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Heuristics and Biases
(2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098 · Cited by 2,293
Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 · Cited by 2,061
The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.7.571 · Cited by 2,046
The Voice of the Customer
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.1.1 · Cited by 2,020
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-r · Cited by 1,866
Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x · Cited by 1,801
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649
Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical -statistical controversy
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293 · Cited by 1,457
Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm
Sullivan, D. (1994) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490203 · Cited by 1,456
Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 · Cited by 1,424
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311410060 · Cited by 1,177
How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking
Edwards, W. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1977.4309720 · Cited by 1,037
Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods
Rigdon, E. E. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010 · Cited by 915
Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice
Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. L. H. (1992) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490258 · Cited by 872
The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.339 · Cited by 836
Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability.
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020762 · Cited by 796
Toward an Integrated Theory of Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, and Schizophrenia
Meehl, P. (1990) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1990.4.1.1 · Cited by 792
Advice taking in decision making: egocentric discounting and reputation formation
Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2909 · Cited by 701
Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability
Dunning, D. A., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.020 · Cited by 689
Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don't make no nevermind.
Wainer, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.213 · Cited by 657
Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics.
Hogarth, R. M. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.197 · Cited by 611
Self-citation
Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2003.822468 · Cited by 582
How voters decide: information processing during election campaigns
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2956 · Cited by 539
A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW
Campion, M. A., PALMER, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.x · Cited by 531
Accuracy of Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation
Makridakis, S., Hibon, M., & Moser, C. A. (1979) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2345077 · Cited by 514
Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions
Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10479858 · Cited by 475
Self-citation
A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making
Stillwell, W. G., Seaver, D. A., & Edwards, W. (1981) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(81)90015-5 · Cited by 475
Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies
Zhang, B., de Winter, J., Varotto, S. F., Happee, R., & Martens, M. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020 · Cited by 470
Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory.
Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.406 · Cited by 446
Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.
Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0015145 · Cited by 424
Assessing Reseller Performance from the Perspective of the Supplier
Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Achrol, R. S. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172573 · Cited by 416
Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.008 · Cited by 424
Two Systems of Reasoning
Sloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 412
The impact of corporate attribites on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe
Owusu‐Ansah, S. (1998) · The International Journal of Accounting · doi:10.1016/s0020-7063(98)90015-2 · Cited by 398
Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making
Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-h · Cited by 398
Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167285111011 · Cited by 400
An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models
Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Waid, C. C. (1982) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.2.182 · Cited by 381
When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists.
Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.603 · Cited by 526
The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction
Muylle, S., Moenaert, R. K., & Despontin, M. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00089-2 · Cited by 366
Accuracy and confidence in group judgment
Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1 · Cited by 354
Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies.
Karelaia, N., & Hogarth, R. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.404 · Cited by 380
Self-citation
Senolytics reduce coronavirus-related mortality in old mice
Camell, C. D., Yousefzadeh, M. J., Zhu, Y., Prata, L. G. P. L., Huggins, M. A., Pierson, M., Zhang, L., O’Kelly, R. D., Pirtskhalava, T., Xun, P., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe4832 · Cited by 320
A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description
Erev, I., Ert, E., Roth, A. E., Haruvy, E. E., Herzog, S. M., Hau, R. C., Hertwig, R., Stewart, T. C., West, R. L., & Lebiere, C. J. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.683 · Cited by 331
Illusions in regression analysis
Armstrong, J. S. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.001 · Cited by 386
Consensus and Uncertainty in Economic Prediction
Zarnowitz, V., & Lambros, L. A. (1983) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w1171 · Cited by 324
A note on aggregating opinions
Hogarth, R. M. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90037-5 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Informants in Organizational Marketing Research: Why Use Multiple Informants and how to Aggregate Responses
van Bruggen, G. H., Lilien, G. L., & Kacker, M. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.4.469.19117 · Cited by 320
Assessing uncertainty in physical constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (1986) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.14447 · Cited by 327
Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments.
Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.733 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.002 · Cited by 312
STRUCTURED INTERVIEWING: RAISING THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW
Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00630.x · Cited by 322
Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.022 · Cited by 285
Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research
Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90003-x · Cited by 281
Quality of group judgment.
Einhorn, H. J., Hogarth, R. M., & Klempner, E. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.158 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
Kirkwood, C. W., & Sarin, R. K. (1985) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.33.1.38 · Cited by 280
The wisdom of select crowds.
Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036677 · Cited by 275
Fast and frugal food choices: Uncovering individual decision heuristics
Scheibehenne, B., Miesler, L., & Todd, P. M. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.224 · Cited by 286
Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management: HEURISTICS IN MANAGEMENT
Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1950 · Cited by 255
Consideration-set heuristics
Hauser, J. R. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.015 · Cited by 269
Interdisciplinary approaches to job design: A constructive replication with extensions.
Campion, M. A. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.467 · Cited by 266
Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment
Bishop, M. A., & Trout, J. D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0195162293.001.0001 · Cited by 256
Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments
Yaniv, I., & Milyavsky, M. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.006 · Cited by 244
Efficient decision heuristics
Thorngate, W. (1980) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830250306 · Cited by 236
Opening Pandora's box: studying the accuracy of managers' perceptions
Starbuck, W. H., & Mezias, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199603)17:2 · Cited by 233
Ecological Rationality: Fast-and-Frugal Heuristics for Managerial Decision Making under Uncertainty
Luan, S., Reb, J. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0172 · Cited by 251
How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment
Yadav, M. S. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09119-7_11 · Cited by 232
Reducing the size of the nondominated set: Pruning by clustering
Morse, J. N. (1980) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(80)90014-3 · Cited by 232
Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.014 · Cited by 235
Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1991) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1603 · Cited by 229
Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support
Sage, A. P. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1981.4308761 · Cited by 225
To combine or not to combine? issues of combining forecasts
Palm, F. C., & Zellner, A. (1992) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.3980110806 · Cited by 222
Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)
Kepes, S., McDaniel, M. A., Brannick, M. Τ., & Banks, G. C. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9300-2 · Cited by 233
Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking?: An MCDM view
Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0115-x · Cited by 219
Human information processing research in accounting: The state of the art
Libby, R., & Lewis, B. L. (1977) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(77)90015-0 · Cited by 218
The Availability Heuristic Revisited: Ease of Recall and Content of Recall as Distinct Sources of Information
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 215
When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.021 · Cited by 211
Experience Effects in Auditing: The Role of Task-Specific Knowledge.
BONNER, S. E. (1990) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-9603274028 · Cited by 207
A User's Guide to Debiasing
Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Payne, J. W. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch33 · Cited by 209
Cognitive niches: An ecological model of strategy selection.
Marewski, J. N., & Schooler, L. J. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0024143 · Cited by 219
ESTIMATING THE SHADOW ECONOMY: A ‘NAIVE’ APPROACH *
Frey, B. S., & Weck‐Hannemann, H. (1983) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041582 · Cited by 205
The Superego, the Ego, and the Id in Statistical Reasoning
Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.003.0013 · Cited by 207
Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges
Libby, R., & Blashfield, R. K. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90044-2 · Cited by 203
The Production of Knowledge
Starbuck, W. H. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288533.001.0001 · Cited by 260
Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness
Zakay, D., & Wooler, S. (1984) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140138408963489 · Cited by 195
The Usefulness of Unit Weights in Creating Composite Scores
Bobko, P., Roth, P., & Buster, M. A. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106294734 · Cited by 206
Good judgments do not require complex cognition
Marewski, J. N., Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0 · Cited by 202
Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.013 · Cited by 195
Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way
Dhami, M. K., & Ayton, P. (2001) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.371 · Cited by 203
IMPLICATIONS OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL NATURE OF JOB PERFORMANCE FOR THE VALIDITY OF SELECTION TESTS: MULTIVARIATE FRAMEWORKS FOR STUDYING TEST VALIDITY
Murphy, K. R., & Shiarella, A. H. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01484.x · Cited by 190

Authors: Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M.
Affiliations: University of Chicago (US)
INSEAD (FR)
ORCID: Hogarth, Robin M.
Venue: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1975-04
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
Pages: 171-192
ISSN: 0030-5073 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6
OpenAlex: W2107426741
Cited by: 673
References: 27
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI: 30.12
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords: composite variables, component weighting, linear regression, predictive power, decision-making, sample size effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Unit weighting schemes for decision making

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks