The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, studies have shown that regression estimates produce ex ante forecasts that are often less accurate than forecasts from 'unit weights' models.”
From Illusions in Regression Analysis (2011) · cites this paper as Einhorn and Hogarth (1975)
Citations
Cites
Gulliksen, H. O. (1950) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1037/13240-000 · Cited by 2,184
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Sargan, J. D., & Zellner, A. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344559 · Cited by 1,938
Linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0037613 · Cited by 1,887
Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-x · Cited by 1,838
An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics.
Aigner, D. J., & Zellner, A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284674 · Cited by 1,687
Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical.
Sawyer, J. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0023624 · Cited by 594
Theory of Psychological Measurement
(1965) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1965.0018 · Cited by 382
Weighting Systems for Linear Functions of Correlated Variables When There is no Dependent Variable
Wilks, S. S. (1938) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02287917 · Cited by 275
Schmidt, F. L. (1971) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447103100310 · Cited by 228
Man-Computer Cooperation in Decisions Requiring Common Sense
Yntema, D. B., & Torgerson, W. S. (1961) · IRE transactions on human factors in electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe2.1961.4503294 · Cited by 180
Costs and payoffs in perceptual research.
von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.609 · Cited by 96
Television Show Preference: Application of a Choice Model
Lehmann, D. R. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88067-4_3 · Cited by 95
The Importance of Differential Weights in Multiple Attribute Models of Consumer Attitude
Beckwith, N. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1973) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377301000203 · Cited by 95
Research Paradigms for Studying Dynamic Decision Behavior
Rapoport, A. (1975) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_22 · Cited by 73
A Comparison of Five Variable Weighting Procedures
Claudy, J. G. (1972) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447203200208 · Cited by 52
Television Show Preference: Application of a Choice Model
Lehmann, D. R. (1971) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3149725 · Cited by 51
The Relative Efficiency of four Test Weighting Methods in Multiple Prediction
Lawshe, C. H., & Schucker, R. E. (1959) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316445901900111 · Cited by 50
Multiple Regression vs. Simple Addition of Scores in Prediction of College Grades
Wesman, A. G., & Bennett, G. K. (1959) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316445901900210 · Cited by 40
On the upper limits of some measures of variability
Katsnelson, J., & Kotz, S. (1957) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/bf02260299 · Cited by 37
Givler, R. C. (1922) · Harper & Brothers eBooks · doi:10.1037/12235-035 · Cited by 35
The Importance of Differential Weights in Multiple Attribute Models of Consumer Attitude
Beckwith, N. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1973) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3149818 · Cited by 29
Measurement of a composite criterion of managerial success
Srinivasan, V., Shocker, A. D., & Weinstein, A. G. (1973) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90043-3 · Cited by 25
Four Methods for Assessing Multi-attribute Utilities: An Experimental Validation
Fischer, G. W. (1972) · doi:10.21236/ad0751564 · Cited by 24
THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENTIAL WEIGHTING
Burt, C. (1950) · British Journal of Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00288.x · Cited by 20
COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ASSEMBLING APTITUDE TEST BATTERIES
Trattner, M. H. (1963) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1963.tb01271.x · Cited by 20
The Reliability of Differences Between Linear Regression Weights in Applied Differential Psychology
Schmidt, F. L. (1972) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447203200403 · Cited by 19
Costs and payoffs in perceptual research.
von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1973) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e446642004-001 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sluckin, 1956, Combining criteria of occupational success: Part II, Occupational Psychology, 30, 57
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 · Cited by 4,037
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
Metadata
- Authors
- Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- INSEAD (FR)
- ORCID
- Hogarth, Robin M.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-192
- ISSN
- 0030-5073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107426741
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 30.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- composite variables, component weighting, linear regression, predictive power, decision-making, sample size effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review