Cited by 69Animal health and immunologyNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Antibacterial properties of saliva: Role in maternal periparturient grooming and in licking wounds

Hart, Benjamin L., Powell, Karen L.·1990·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Canine saliva was tested for its bactericidal effects against pathogens relevant to the presumed hygienic functions of maternal grooming of the mammary and anogenital areas and licking of wounds. Both female and male saliva were bactericidal against Escherichia coli and Streptococcus canis but only slightly, and nonsignificantly, bactericidal against coagulase positive staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. E. coli is the cause of highly fatal coliform enteritis of neonatal mammals and E. coli and S. canis are the main pathogens implicated in neonatal septicemia of dogs. The bactericidal effects of saliva would facilitate the hygienic function of maternal licking of the mammary and anogenital areas in protecting newborns from these diseases. E. coli and S. canis along with coagulase positive staphylococcus and P. aeruginosa are among the common wound contaminants of dogs. Wound licking, and the application of saliva, would thus reduce wound contamination by E. coli and S. canis. The resistance of staphylococcus to bactericidal effects of saliva may be a factor in the high frequency (46 percent) with which coagulase positive staphylococcus was isolated from wounds compared with much lower frequency (9-17 percent) with which E. coli and S. canis were isolated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90332-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The saliva of dogs is only slightly, and non-significantly, bactericidal against wound bacteria such as coagulase positive staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

    “However, the saliva is only slightly, and non-significantly, bactericidal against wound bacteria such as coagulase positive staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [157].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, B. L., & Powell, K. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-09
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
383-386
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026646998
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2s07rr005457-29)
  • National Center for Research Resources (2S07-RR-05457)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
bactericidal activity, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus canis, coagulase-positive staphylococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, neonatal sepsis, wound contamination, maternal behavior, dogs
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Dogs, Escherichia coli, Female, Grooming, Male, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Saliva, Skin, Streptococcus, Wound Healing, Wound Infection, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review