Cited by 130Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Involvement of the main but not the accessory olfactory system in maternal behavior of primiparous and multiparous ewes

Lévy, F., Locatelli, A., Piketty, V., Tillet, Y., Poindron, P.·1995·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The respective roles of the main and accessory olfactory systems in the development of maternal behavior and selective suckling were investigated in parturient primiparous and multiparous ewes. Vomeronasal nerve section before parturition did not disturb either maternal behavior or maternal selectivity at suckling. By contrast, anosmia induced by zinc sulphate infusion had significant effects on the onset of maternal behavior in primiparous ewes. The onset of licking and of suckling were delayed and licking times and maternal bleats were reduced. Such disturbances were not observed in multiparous anosmic ewes, indicating that experience can compensate for the loss of olfactory information. On the other hand, anosmia prevented selective care regardless of maternal experience. Our results underline the importance of the main olfactory system for the development of adequate maternal behavior in sheep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00200-o

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that OT may play a role in mediating the beneficial effects of social support on immune function and stress reactivity.

    “There is some evidence that OT may play a role in mediating these effects but more research is needed in this area, particularly with respect to immune function (for a review see Neumann in this Issue [84]).”
  • The recognition of newborn lambs by ewes also appears to depend on the main olfactory system, although a vomeronasal contribution has also been reported.

    “The recognition of newborn lambs by ewes also appears to depend on the main olfactory system (Levy et al., 1995), although a vomeronasal contribution has also been reported (Booth and Katz, 2000).”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lévy, F., Locatelli, A., Piketty, V., Tillet, Y., & Poindron, P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Lévy, F.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
97-104
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013679119
Cited by
130
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
maternal behavior, vomeronasal system, accessory olfactory system, main olfactory system, sheep, ewes, anosmia, zinc sulfate, primiparous ewes, multiparous ewes, maternal experience, childbirth
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Maternal Behavior, Olfactory Bulb, Olfactory Pathways, Parity, Pregnancy, Sheep, Smell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review