Cited by 81Diabetes Management and ResearchNeurological and metabolic disordersPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Hypoglycemia-induced cognitive dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: Effect of hypoglycemia unawareness

Gold, Ann E., MacLeod, Kenneth M., Deary, Ian J., Frier, Brian M.·1995·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Hypoglycemia results in cognitive dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the degree of cognitive dysfunction experienced by insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) with hypoglycemia unawareness with patients with normal awareness of hypoglycemia. Cognitive function was examined in 10 patients who had normal awareness of the onset of hypoglycemia and 10 patients who had a history of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. A hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp was used to manipulate blood glucose concentrations. Cognitive function was assessed using Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP), Trial Making B (TMB), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Multivariate analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive function (p < 0.01). A trend was observed towards an overall effect of awareness on performance (p = 0.08). There were trends in the effects of awareness on RVIP correct responses across time (p = 0.07) and the interaction of awareness by study by TMB (p = 0.08). During hypoglycemia subjects with impaired awareness were less cautious in their responses (RVIP misses p = 0.03) and on recovery from hypoglycemia, their cognitive function remained abnormal (TMB p = 0.04, RVIP correct responses p = 0.02, RVIP misses p = 0.04). Thus, IDDM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness exhibited more profound cognitive dysfunction during acute hypoglycemia which persisted for longer following blood glucose recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00085-w

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gold, A. E., MacLeod, K. M., Deary, I. J., & Frier, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Gold, Ann E.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-09
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
501-511
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992686377
Cited by
81
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
British Dietetic Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, cognitive impairment, type 1 diabetes, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, attention, executive function, visuospatial processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Awareness, Blood Pressure, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review