Cited by 36Thermoregulation and physiological responsesThermal Regulation in MedicineBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

Effects of the menstrual cycle on dressing behavior in the cold

KIM, H, HIROMI·1995·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of the menstrual cycle on dressing behavior in cold exposure. Rectal and skin temperatures, temperature sensation and metabolic rate were measured in seven women during the luteal (L) and the follicular (F) phases of the menstrual cycle, as was their dressing behavior in these two phases. The subjects were instructed to dress so as to feel comfortable when the ambient temperature was decreased from 30 degrees C to 15 degrees C (07:00-09:00). Most subjects dressed more quickly and with thicker clothing in the L phase. They felt cooler in the L phase during the last 30 min of the temperature fall. Rectal and skin temperatures showed significant differences between L and F phases and metabolic rate was significantly higher in the L phase. The results can be interpreted in terms of the establishment of a higher set-point in core temperature during the L phase.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00118-3

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women reported that they felt cooler in the last 30 min of exposure to the decreasing air temperature in the luteal phase.

    “They also reported that they felt cooler in the last 30 min of exposure to the decreasing air temperature in the luteal phase.”
  • Women exposed to decreasing air temperature (from 30°C to 15°C) dressed quicker and put on thicker clothes when in the luteal phase than when in the follicular phase.

    “Women exposed to decreasing air temperature (from 30°C to 15°C) dressed quicker and put on thicker clothes when in the luteal phase than when in the follicular phase [120].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KIM, H., & HIROMI
Affiliations
Nara Women's University (JP)
Corresponding author
HIROMI
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
699-703
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991575457
Cited by
36
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
menstrual cycle, luteal phase, follicular phase, cold exposure, thermoregulation, core body temperature, skin temperature, rectal temperature, thermal sensation, metabolic rate, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature Regulation, Clothing, Cold Climate, Energy Metabolism, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Reference Values, Skin Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review