Cited by 25Thermoregulation and physiological responsesCircadian rhythm and melatoninBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

Circadian variation of preferred environmental temperature and body temperature

Terai, Y., Asayama, M., Ogawa, T., Sugenoya, J., Miyagawa, T.·1985·Journal of Thermal Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4565(85)90019-1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The assumption in thermal comfort prescriptions is primarily based on thermal comfort studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s.

    “This assumption is primarily based on thermal comfort studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s [12–17].”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Results from at least four other studies seem to contradict the tendency to prefer higher temperatures in the early evening.

    “However, the results from at least four other studies [12–17] seem to contradict these results.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Among the 15 reviewed experimental studies investigating diurnal variations in thermal perception, six found no significant differences in thermal perception.

    “Among the 15 reviewed experimental studies investigating diurnal variations in thermal perception, six found no significant differences in thermal perception [12–17,78]”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Terai and colleagues found the lowest mean preferred temperature at 17:00, but the difference was not statistically significant.

    “The lowest mean preferred temperature was found at 17:00, but the difference was not statistically significant.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Past thermal comfort studies, including some reviewed here, have highlighted that variance in the thermal sensory response is greater in female versus male subjects.

    “Past thermal comfort studies, including some of those reviewed here [12–17], already highlighted that variance in the thermal sensory response is greater in female versus male subjects.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terai, Y., Asayama, M., Ogawa, T., Sugenoya, J., & Miyagawa, T.
Affiliations
Aichi Medical University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Thermal Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-10
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
151-156
ISSN
0306-4565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976005738
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Thermal Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
circadian rhythm, body temperature, thermal comfort, water temperature preference, core body temperature, set-point theory, temperature regulation, thermoregulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review