CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Younger Dryas Climatic Reversal in Northeastern USA? AMS Ages for an Old Problem

Peteet, D. M., Vogel, J. S., Nelson, D. E., Southon, J. R., Nickmann, R. J., Heusser, L. E.·1990·Quaternary Research
DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(90)90020-l
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Late-glacial macrofossils from a 10-m core from Alpine Swamp, New Jersey, were radiocarbon dated using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). The arrival of the first trees to the area following deglaciation is indicated by maximum percentages of spruce pollen and a date of 12,290 ± 440 yr B.P. on a single spruce needle. Subsequent spread of deciduous hardwoods was followed by the expansion of boreal taxa, including spruce ( Picea ), fir ( Abies ), larch ( Larix laricina ), paper birch ( Betula papyrifera ), and alder ( Alnus ). Three AMS dates on paper birch seeds and a spruce needle during this boreal expansion indicate that it took place between 11,000 and 10,000 yr B.P. The timing of this vegetational shift and its correlation with late-glacial pollen stratigraphy from many sites in southern New England indicate that a climatic reversal correlative with the Younger Dryas characterized the North Atlantic seaboard of the United States.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0033-5894(90)90020-l

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Younger Dryas has been convincingly documented from terrestrial sites near the Atlantic Coast of northern North America.

    “Only recently has the Younger Dryas been convincingly documented from terrestrial sites near the Atlantic Coast of northern North America (Mott et al., 1986;Peteet et al., 1990;Mayle et al., 1993).”

    From Late-Quaternary history of the alpine flora of the New Hampshire White Mountains (2002) · cites this paper as Peteet et al., 1990

  • The paleoecological records of woodlands show no signs of the Younger Dryas climatic reversal found at sites farther south in New England, farther northeast in Atlantic Canada, or farther west in western Ohio and Indiana.

    “The paleoecological records of woodlands show no signs of the Younger Dryas climatic reversal found at sites farther south in New England (Peteet et al. 1990), farther to the northeast in Atlantic Canada (Mott et al. 1986, Wright 1989, Levesque et al. 1993), or farther west in western Ohio and Indiana (Shane 1987).”

    From Late Quaternary History of Low‐ and Mid‐Elevation Vegetation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire (1994) · cites this paper as Peteet et al. 1990

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.2307/1933891 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.145.3638.1293 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.218.4579.1273 · DOI
  4. Fowells, 1965, Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States
  5. Miller, 1979, Boreal and western North American plants in the late Pleistocene of Vermont, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 60, 167, 10.5962/p.185883 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1984.tb00066.x · DOI
  7. Davis, 1983, Holocene vegetational history of the eastern United States, Late Quaternary Environments of the United States, Vol. 2, 166
  8. Watts, 1983, Vegetational history of the eastern United States 25,000 to 10,000 years ago, Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States, Vol. 1, 294
  9. 10.1029/PA003i001p00001 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/328609a0 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF01277044 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0033-5894(72)90090-7 · DOI
  13. Mott, 1986, A late-glacial buried organic profile near Brooksdale, Nova Scotia, Current Research, Part B, Geolological Survey of Canada Paper, 86-1B, 289
  14. 10.1306/74D71807-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D · DOI
  15. 10.2475/ajs.257.5.366 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0033-5894(75)90040-X · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1987.tb00750.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keigwin, 1988, High resolution paleoclimatic change in the North Atlantic Ocean, AMQUA Abstracts, 24
  19. 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1988.tb00968.x · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.42.11.863 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0031-0182(81)90097-3 · DOI
  22. 10.2475/ajs.237.10.691 · DOI
  23. 10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<2362:LTVODI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0034-6667(67)90150-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S003382220000730X · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1139/e79-097 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/323247a0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/1942471 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0033-5894(86)90062-1 · DOI
  30. Deevey, 1958, Radiocarbon-dated pollen sequences in eastern North America, Veroffentilichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes Rubel in Zurich, 34, 30
  31. Faegri, 1975, Textbook of Pollen Analysis
  32. 10.2307/1942564 · DOI
  33. Braun, 1950, Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America
  34. 1974, Climates of the States
  35. Evenson, 1983, The mode and chronology of deglaciation of the Great Valley, northwestern New Jersey, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 15, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peteet, D. M., Vogel, J. S., Nelson, D. E., Southon, J. R., Nickmann, R. J., & Heusser, L. E.
Venue
Quaternary Research
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1990-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0033-5894
  • 1096-0287
DOI
10.1016/0033-5894(90)90020-l
Cited by
95
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 9822 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review