The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contingencies of innovative networks: A case study of successful interfirm R & D collaboration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Due to its positive impact on information flows, trust based behaviour characterised by implicit open-ended contracts is cited as a crucial factor in enhancing innovation through inter-firm collaboration (Hausler et al, 1994, Hoang andAntoncic, 2003) and an integral reason for inter-firm networks' longevity (Lipparini and Sobrero, 1994).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Hausler et al, 1994
In the citing paper
“Science partners also act as brokers, intermediaries or neutral agents within networks enabling different business systems to communicate by generating trust between different parties (Hausler, Hohn and Lutz, 1994).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Hausler, Hohn and Lutz, 1994
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
Bijker, W. E., & Latour, B. (1988) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105094 · Cited by 10,770
(1987) · Cited by 8,955
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489
(1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,056
Managing the flow of technology
Allen, T. J. (1977) · Cited by 2,468
Collaborate with your competitors and win
Hamel, G. (1989) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,104
Technical change and economic theory
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5168 · Cited by 1,986
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process
Tushman, M. L. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392402 · Cited by 1,496
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Asbeck, 1990, Wirkungsvolle Zusammenarbeit gleichberechtigter Partner. Die Arbeit von strategischen Allianzen. Das Beispiel Kolbenschmidt, Blick durch die Wirtschaft, 7
- Bronder, 1991, Strategische Allianzen zur Steigerung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, io Management-Zeitschrift, 60, 27
- Bullinger, 1990, Integrierte Produktentwicklung XV. Produktionsmittelhersteller und Zulieferer müssen weiterentwickeln. Eine Kooperation kann eigene F + E-Kapazität, Handelsblatt, 20
- Putnam, 1988, Diplomacy and Domestic Policy: The Logic of Two-Level Games, Internal Organization, 42, 429
- Sabel, 1990, Can the End of the Social Democratic Trade Unions be the Beginning of a new Kind of Social Democratic Politics?
- Séguin, 1991, Uncertainty, Complexity and Strategic Alliances
- Teece, 1989, Inter-organizational Requirements of the Innovations Process, Managerial and Decision Economics, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Network-based research in entrepreneurship
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00081-2 · Cited by 2,302
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,093
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence
David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00087-6 · Cited by 1,640
Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.1.31.17985 · Cited by 1,035
Metadata
- Authors
- Häusler, J., Hohn, H.-W., & Lütz, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Häusler, Jürgen
- ORCID
- Lütz, Susanne
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-66
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027382139
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- trust building, research collaboration, public officials, government-sponsored research, innovation networks, industrial research cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
