Cited by 18Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Locomotor activity in morphine-treated rats: effects of and comparisons between cocaine, procaine, and lidocaine

Wiechman, B·1981·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

The effects of cocaine, procaine, and lidocaine on open field and spontaneous (actophotometer) locomotor activities were assessed and compared in rats (1) treated acutely with morphine (single injection), (2) made dependent on morphine (SC pellets), (3) implanted with morphine and withdrawn at the time of peak dependence, and (4) implanted SC with lactose-containing pellets (sham). Cocaine-induced (10 or 30 mg/kg) open field and spontaneous locomotor activities were significantly greater in each of the four groups than those of the corresponding groups administered saline. Procaine (50 or 100 mg/kg) significantly reduced open field locomotor activity in all morphine-treated rats and spontaneous locomotor activity in acute rats. Lidocaine (30 mg/kg) significantly depressed spontaneous locomotor activity in acute rats. Upon comparison of the activities induced by the three local anesthetics, open field locomotor activity of sham-implanted rats was greater following cocaine (10 or 30 mg/kg) than following procaine (50 or 100 mg/kg). Only morphine withdrawn rats manifested greater activity following cocaine (10 mg/kg) than following either procaine (50 mg/kg) or lidocaine (10 mg/kg); activities were equivalent in dependent and acute rats. In contrast, cocaine-induced (30 mg/kg) open field locomotor activity of all morphine-treated rats was greater than either procaine- (100 mg/kg) or lidocaine- (30 mg/kg) induced activities. Spontaneous locomotor activity of all groups except acute morphine was greater following both doses of cocaine than following both doses of either procaine or lidocaine. In acute rats, only cocaine (10 mg/kg, induced greater activity than the other local anesthetics. Thus, stimulation of locomotor activity following cocaine treatment is a pharmacological property unique to cocaine and not shared by either procaine or lidocaine. Further, the data indicate that the methods selected for assessing locomotor activity may not give comparable results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90273-2

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wiechman, B.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Wiechman, B
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
425-433
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084809762
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
locomotor activity, cocaine, procaine, lidocaine, morphine dependence, morphine withdrawal, local anesthetics, open field behavior, spontaneous motor activity, locomotor stimulant effects, method comparison
MeSH terms
Animals, Cocaine, Humans, Lidocaine, Male, Morphine, Morphine Dependence, Motor Activity, Procaine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review