Cited by 92Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Affiliation in periadolescent rats: behavioral and corticosterone response to social reunion with familiar or unfamiliar partners

Cirulli, Francesca, Terranova, Maria Livia, Laviola, Giovanni·1996·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the social relationship between periadolescent rats, which is characterized by a high expression of play behavior, resembles attachment or whether it reflects a nonspecific social attraction between peers. Sprague-Dawley rats have been kept in pairs with a conspecific of the same age and sex from the time of weaning (PND 21). On PND 34, the members of each pair were separated for a 24-h period and randomly assigned to one of three groups: a) immediately sacrificed (NT = nontreated); b) reunited for 30 min with their previous cagemate (FAM); or c) with an unfamiliar conspecific of the same age and sex (UNF). During the reunion, the occurrence of both social and nonsocial behaviors was scored. Overall, periadolescent UNF animals spent more time in social investigation than FAM rats, which were conversely more involved in cage-oriented activities. In addition, higher levels of rough-and-tumble play were expressed in encounters between UNF subjects than between FAM rats. Finally, within the female group, UNF rats were more involved in play soliciting and less in digging activity than FAM animals. Blood corticosterone levels, which were measured at the end of the separation period, were higher in females than in males and were significantly lower than following reunion in a novel environment. The degree of familiarity did not affect hormonal changes. Results suggest that periadolescent rats do not form attachment relationships with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02169-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Play-soliciting behaviors are higher in females than in males when playing with an unfamiliar partner.

    “In fact, play-soliciting behaviors were found to be higher in females than in males when playing with an unfamiliar partner (Cirulli et al., 1996).”

    From Sex-specific modulation of juvenile social play by vasopressin (2013) · cites this paper as Cirulli et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cirulli, F., Terranova, M. L., & Laviola, G.
Affiliations
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-05
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
99-105
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966120848
Cited by
92
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
social affiliation, periadolescence, attachment, partner familiarity, corticosterone, rough-and-tumble play, social investigation, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Corticosterone, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review