Cited by 516Pesticide Exposure and ToxicityMedical Case Reports and StudiesPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Chronic central nervous system effects of acute organophosphate pesticide intoxication

ROSENSTOCK, L·1991·The Lancet

Abstract

Acute organophosphate pesticide poisonings cause substantial morbidity and mortality world wide; however, whether organophosphates cause chronic neurological sequelae has not been established. To see whether single episodes of acute unintentional organophosphate intoxication lead to chronic neuropsychological dysfunction, we carried out a retrospective study of agricultural workers in Nicaragua who had been admitted to hospital between July 1, 1986, and July 31, 1988, for occupationally related organophosphate intoxication. This "poisoned" group (36 men) was tested on average about two years after the episode of pesticide poisoning and compared with a matched control group. The poisoned group did much worse than the control group on all neuropsychological subtests, with significantly worse performance on five of six subtests of a World Health Organisation neuropsychological test battery and on 3 of 6 additional tests that assessed verbal and visual attention, visual memory, visuomotor speed, sequencing and problem solving, and motor steadiness and dexterity. Differences in neuropsychological performance could not be explained by other factors. The findings of a persistent decrease in neuropsychological performance among individuals with previous intoxication emphasise the importance of prevention of even single episodes of organophosphate poisoning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90356-t

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROSENSTOCK, L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
ROSENSTOCK, L
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-07
Volume
338
Issue
8761
Pages
223-227
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2095774921
Cited by
516
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Medical Case Reports and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
organophosphate poisoning, pesticide poisoning, agricultural labor, occupational exposure, neuropsychological dysfunction, cognitive impairment, attention, visual memory, motor coordination, poisoning prevention
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Central Nervous System, Chronic Disease, Humans, Insecticides, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Nicaragua, Occupational Diseases, Organophosphorus Compounds, Psychomotor Performance, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review