Cited by 46Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Market Behavior and PricingCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Store-choice behavior for pre-owned merchandise

Darley, William K., Lim, Jeen-Su·1993·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0148-2963(93)90013-f

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darley, W. K., & Lim, J.-S.
Affiliations
University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Darley, William K.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-05
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
17-31
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025368759
Cited by
46
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
store choice, second-hand goods, store patronage, consumer behavior, conceptual model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review