Cited by 351Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyStress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

The role of endorphins in stress: Evidence and speculations

Amir, Shimon, Brown, Zavie W., Amit, Zalman·1980·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Several lines of evidence suggest that the endogenous opioid peptides endorphins may play a role in the defensive response of the organism to stress. The present paper summarizes these findings as well as evidence linking endorphins to the anterior pituitary polypeptide hormone adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). Evidence is presented that endorphins may function as trophic hormones in peripheral target organs such as the adrenal medulla and the pancreas. As such they may be part of the physiological mechanisms that mediate adrenaline and glucagon release in response to stress. Endorphins (enkephalins) are also suggested to play a role in the control of the pituitary gland during stress. In such capacity they may act as hormone-releasing or inhibiting factors. Finally, endorphins appear to play a role in the behavioral concomitants of stress. In such capacity endorphins are suggested to function as modulators of neural systems that mediate the elaboration and expression of the reactive/affective components of stress. Speculations on the mode of interaction between endorphins and ACTH in the global response to stress are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0149-7634(80)90027-5

Cites

249 of 249 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive game-playing experiences trigger release of hormones such as endorphins and striatal dopamine that are responsible for feelings of pleasure and well-being.

    “Evidence from neuropsychological research further suggests the therapeutic value of game-based digital interventions in depression therapy, finding that positive game-playing experiences trigger the release of hormones such as endorphins and striatal dopamine7,8 that are responsible for feelings of pleasure and well-being.9,10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amir, S., Brown, Z. W., & Amit, Z.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
77-86
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076340827
Cited by
351
References
249
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
endorphins, enkephalin, stress response, ACTH, anterior pituitary, trophic hormones, adrenal medulla, pancreas, adrenaline secretion, glucagon secretion, pituitary regulation, behavioral stress response, opioid peptides
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adrenal Medulla, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Animals, Chemistry, Emotions, Endorphins, Epinephrine, Glucagon, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Naloxone, Pain, Pituitary Gland, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Opioid, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Vasopressins, Rats, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review