The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of prematurity and socioeconomic status in the onset of canonical babbling in infants
Open accessAbstract
The onset of canonical babbling (implying production of well-formed syllables) is a landmark event in the development of the capacity for speech, capping a series of vocal stages of the infant's first year of life. Infants who are handicapped with regard to linguistic development are, in some cases, delayed in the onset of speech-like sounds such as canonical syllables. The age of onset of canonical babbling in infants born at risk, either due to prematurity or due to low socioeconomic status (SES) has not been extensively studied. This research, based on a longitudinal investigation of babbling and other motor milestones in term and preterm infants of middle and low SES, indicates that the onset of canonical babbling is robust with regard to such risk factors. Neither preterm infants whose ages were corrected for gestational age, nor infants of low SES were delayed in the onset of canonical babbling. In fact, at corrected ages, the preterm infants appeared to begin canonical babbling earlier than their full-term counterparts. It is suggested that the greater auditory experience of the preterms in this study may account for the early appearance of canonical babbling and hand banging, both of which can be viewed as rhythmic stereotypies that may require auditory feedback for normal development. Other motor milestones studied showed neither delay nor acceleration of onset in the same infants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Audition in Infant Babbling
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (1988) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130323 · Cited by 580
Self-citationTHE EMERGENCE OF THE SOUNDS OF SPEECH IN INFANCY
OLLER, D. K. (1980) · Child Phonology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-770601-6.50011-5 · Cited by 548
Self-citation
Cited by
IVERSON, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000909990432 · Cited by 964
Child-Directed Speech Is Infrequent in a Forager-Farmer Population: A Time Allocation Study
Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Gurven, M., & Stieglitz, J. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12974 · Cited by 284
The Significance of Biology for Human Development: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0105 · Cited by 274
Long, H. L., Ramsay, G., Griebel, U., Bene, E. R., Bowman, D. D., Burkhardt-Reed, M. M., & Oller, D. K. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279395 · Cited by 33
Self-citationShinya, Y., Kawai, M., Niwa, F., Imafuku, M., & Myowa, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02195 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K., Levine, S., Basinger, D., Lynch, M. P., & Urbano, R.
- Venue
- Infant Behavior and Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-315
- ISSN
- 0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981849723
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of prematurity and socioeconomic status in the onset of canonical babbling in infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0163-6383(93)80037-9
- The paper
- Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K., Levine, S., Basinger, D., Lynch, M. P., & Urbano, R. (1993). The role of prematurity and socioeconomic status in the onset of canonical babbling in infants. Infant Behavior and Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(93)80037-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.