Cited by 561Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons

Open access
Meltzoff, Andrew N., Keith Moore, M.·1994·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Imitation was tested both immediately and after a 24-hr retention interval in 6-week-old infants. The results showed immediate imitation, which replicates past research, and also imitation from memory, which is new. The latter finding implicates recall memory and establishes that 6-week-olds can generate actions on the basis of stored representations. The motor organization involved in imitation was investigated through a microanalysis of the matching response. Results revealed that infants gradually modified their behavior towards more accurate matches over successive trials. It is proposed that early imitation serves a social identity function. Infants are motivated to imitate after a 24-hr delay as a means of clarifying whether the person they see before them is the same one they previously encountered. They use the reenactment of a person's behavior to probe whether this is the same person. In the domain of inanimate objects, infants use physical manipulations (e.g., shaking) to perform this function. Imitation is to understanding people as physical manipulation is to understanding things. Motor imitation, the behavioral reenactment of things people do, is a primitive means of understanding and communicating with people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0163-6383(94)90024-8

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceptual experience that guides sensory-motor learning is also seen in infants' imitation of nonspeech oral movements and in sign language.

    “Perceptual experience that guides sensory-motor learning also is seen in infants' imitation of nonspeech oral movements (94, 95) and in sign language (96).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [95]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meltzoff, A. N., & Keith Moore, M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Meltzoff, Andrew N.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
83-99
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170978445
Cited by
561
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 24
FWCI
21.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD022514)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
imitation, infant memory, recall memory, social identity, person recognition, motor imitation, social cognition, person representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review