Cited by 49Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Do PETS have long or short ears? Mental imagery and neuroimaging

MOSCOVITCH, M, BEHRMANN, M, WINOCUR, G·1994·Trends in Neurosciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90060-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task demands and content can alter the neural mechanisms of mental imagery, while attention affects imagery depth and perceptual processing within a hierarchical architecture.

    “In addition, task demands and content can modulate the neural mechanisms that mediate the mental imagery (Kosslyn and Thompson, 2003; Kraemer et al., 2005), and attentional factors also influence the depth of imagery and perceptual processing in a hierarchical neural architecture (Moscovitch et al., 1994; Roland and Gulyas, 1994; Sakai and Miyashita, 1994; Mellet et al., 1998).”

    From Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models (2010) · cites this paper as Moscovitch et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MOSCOVITCH, M., BEHRMANN, M., & WINOCUR, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Baycrest Hospital (CA)
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
292-294
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021165403
Cited by
49
References
14
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
visual imagery, visual perception, early visual cortex, retinotopic organization, positron emission tomography, brain-damaged patients
MeSH terms
Brain, Eidetic Imagery, Humans, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review