Collective invention

Allen, Robert C.·1983·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

DOI 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

How open is innovation?
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 2,435
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies
O'Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422 · Cited by 626
Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation
West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710802033734 · Cited by 497
Open source software development—Just another case of collective invention?
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004 · Cited by 281
Welfare Implications of User Innovation
Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2005) · Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield · doi:10.1007/0-387-25022-0_5 · Cited by 174
Horizontal Innovation Networks - by and for Users
von Hippel, E. (2002) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.328900 · Cited by 70
Economic Development without Pre-requisites: How Bolivian Producers Met Strict Food Safety Standards and Dominated the Global Brazil-Nut Market
Coslovsky, S. V. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.012 · Cited by 41
A new institutional approach to innovation policy
Davidson, S., & Potts, J. (2016) · Australian Economic Review · doi:10.1111/1467-8462.12153 · Cited by 27

Authors: Allen, R. C.
Venue: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1983-03
Volume: 4
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-24
ISSN: 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9
OpenAlex: W4244271433
Cited by: 656
References: 0
FWCI: 3.03
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review