Cited by 60Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal testing and alternativesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Laboratory mice persist in gaining access to resources: a method of assessing the importance of environmental features

Sherwin, C.M.·1996·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01027-1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mice and rats will work to obtain social contact.

    “and will actively work to obtain social contact46,47.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherwin, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Sherwin, C.M.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
48
Issue
3-4
Pages
203-213
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020542762
Cited by
60
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
laboratory mice, animal welfare, access to resources, water crossing, food access, shelter, running wheel, environmental enrichment, behavioral repertoire, sawdust bedding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review