Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp

Open access
Allison, Truett, McCarthy, Gregory, Wood, Charles C.·1992·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section

Abstract

In scalp recordings, stimulation of the median nerve evokes a number of long-latency (40-300 msec) somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) whose neural origins are unknown. We attempted to infer the generators of these potentials by comparing them with SEPs recorded from the cortical surface or from within the brain. SEPs recorded from contralateral sensorimotor cortex can be characterized as "precentral," "postcentral," or "pericentral." The scalp-recorded P45, N60 and P100 potentials appear to correspond to the pericentral P50, N90 and P190 potentials and are probably generated mainly in contralateral area 1 of somatosensory cortex. The scalp-recorded N70-P70 appear to correspond to the precentral and postcentral N80-P80 and are generated mainly in contralateral area 3b of somatosensory cortex. The scalp-recorded N120-P120 appear to correspond to the intracranial N100-P100 and are probably generated bilaterally in the second somatosensory areas. N140 and P190 (the "vertex potentials") are probably generated bilaterally in the frontal lobes, including orbito-frontal, lateral and mesial (supplementary motor area) cortex. The supplementary sensory area probably generates long-latency SEPs, but preliminary recordings have yet to confirm this assumption. Most of the proposed correspondences are speculative because the different conditions under which scalp and intracranial recordings are obtained make comparison difficult. Human recordings using chronically implanted cortical surface electrodes, and monkey studies of SEPs which appear to be analogs of the human potentials, should provide better answers regarding the precise generators of human long-latency SEPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90082-m

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C.
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
301-314
ISSN
0168-5597 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040456503
Cited by
278
References
48
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0168-5597(92)90082-m
The paper
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1992). The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(92)90082-m

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.