Cited by 343Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies

Open access
Conde, Virginia, Tomasevic, Leo, Akopian, Irina, Stanek, Konrad, Saturnino, Guilherme B., Thielscher, Axel, Bergmann, Til Ole, Siebner, Hartwig Roman·2019·NeuroImage

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) excites populations of neurons in the stimulated cortex, and the resulting activation may spread to connected brain regions. The distributed cortical response can be recorded with electroencephalography (EEG). Since TMS also stimulates peripheral sensory and motor axons and generates a loud "click" sound, the TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) reflect not only neural activity induced by transcranial neuronal excitation but also neural activity due to somatosensory and auditory processing. In 17 healthy young individuals, we systematically assessed the contribution of multisensory peripheral stimulation to TEPs using a TMS-compatible EEG system. Real TMS was delivered with a figure-of-eight coil over the left para-median posterior parietal cortex or superior frontal gyrus with the coil being oriented perpendicularly or in parallel to the target gyrus. We also recorded the EEG responses evoked by realistic sham stimulation over the posterior parietal and superior frontal cortex, mimicking the auditory and somatosensory sensations evoked by real TMS. We applied state-of-the-art procedures to attenuate somatosensory and auditory confounds during real TMS, including the placement of a foam layer underneath the coil and auditory noise masking. Despite these precautions, the temporal and spatial features of the cortical potentials evoked by real TMS at the prefrontal and parietal site closely resembled the cortical potentials evoked by realistic sham TMS, both for early and late TEP components. Our findings stress the need to include a peripheral multisensory control stimulation in the design of TMS-EEG studies to enable a dissociation between truly transcranial and non-transcranial components of TEPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.052

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Thielscher, A., Antunes, A., Saturnino, G.B., 2015. Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: a useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015, 222-225.
  2. WHO, 2015. Hearing Loss Due to Recreational Exposure to Loud Sounds: a Review.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conde, V., Tomasevic, L., Akopian, I., Stanek, K., Saturnino, G. B., Thielscher, A., Bergmann, T. O., & Siebner, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
185
Pages
300-312
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950858886
Cited by
343
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 7
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0011413)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R118-A11308, R126-2012-12422, R59-A5399)
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
  • Region Hovedstaden (R135-A4841)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
TMS-evoked potentials, transcranial magnetic stimulation, sham stimulation, multisensory processing, parietal cortex, frontal cortex, confounding adjustment
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Artifacts, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review