Cited by 100Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Localization of multiple dopamine receptor subtype mRNAs in human and monkey motor cortex and striatum

Huntley, G.W., Morrison, J.H., Prikhozhan, A., Sealfon, S.C.·1992·Molecular Brain Research

Abstract

Dopamine plays a critical role in motor and cognitive function through actions mediated by specific receptors, multiple subtypes of which have recently been identified. The distribution of mRNAs encoding D1, D2 and D5 receptors in the motor cortex of humans and in the motor cortex and striatum of macaque monkeys was examined using in situ hybridization. In motor cortices from both primate species, hybridization to each receptor probe resulted in numerous labeled cells throughout layers II-VI. In contrast to neocortex, in monkey striatum only the D1 and D2 receptor probes showed significant hybridization. Thus, not only does primate neocortex possess a broader representation of the dopamine receptor subtype mRNAs examined in comparison with striatum, but the unexpected presence and widespread distribution of D2 and D5 receptor mRNAs in cortex suggests that, along with D1 receptors, D2 and D5 receptors play a crucial role in the dopaminergic modulation of cognition and motor behavior, and in dopamine dysfunction associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0169-328x(92)90107-m

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brodmann, 1903, Beitrage zur histologischen Lokalisation der Grosshrinrindie. I. Die Regio rolandica, J. Psychol. Neurol. Lpz., 2, 79
  2. Feldman, 1984, Morphology of the neocortical pyramidal neuron, Vol. 1, 123
  3. Jones, 1984, Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells, Vol. 1, 521

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huntley, G. W., Morrison, J. H., Prikhozhan, A., & Sealfon, S. C.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Morrison, J.H.
Venue
Molecular Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-10
Volume
15
Issue
3-4
Pages
181-188
ISSN
0169-328X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067838356
Cited by
100
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01mh045212-05, 5r01mh048603-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 45212, MH48603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
dopamine receptors, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine D5 receptor, motor cortex, striatum, macaque, human brain, neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Female, Humans, Macaca fascicularis, Male, Motor Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine, RNA, Messenger, RNA Probes, In Situ Hybridization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review