The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human wound fluid from acute wounds stimulates fibroblast and endothelial cell growth
Open accessAbstract
One proposed mechanism for the beneficial effect of occlusive dressings on healing is the maintenance of contact between the wound bed and accumulated wound fluid, which is thought to contain growth stimulatory substances. We have examined the effect of human wound fluid on the in vitro growth of human dermal fibroblasts and umbilical vein endothelial cells. Acute wound fluid was collected from six patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting. The acute wound fluid was sterilely collected daily from underneath a vapor-permeable membrane applied to the donor site and changed every 24 hours for 3 days postoperatively. After seeding in optimal growth media (control) on day 0, cultures of human dermal fibroblasts and umbilical vein endothelial cells were supplemented with or without acute wound fluid on the next day (day 1) and on day 3. As determined by cell counts, 2% acute wound fluid stimulated the growth of human dermal fibroblasts (p less than 0.05) and umbilical vein endothelial cells (p less than 0.01) when these cells were cultured in 2% fetal bovine serum and endothelial growth medium, respectively. Wound fluid from postoperative days 1 or 3 caused the same level of stimulation. The addition of an anti-platelet-derived growth factor antibody to wound fluid resulted in a 45% mean reduction in its stimulatory effect on fibroblast growth (p less than 0.02), suggesting that platelet-derived growth factor contributes to the observed effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines
WERNER, S., & GROSE, R. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835 · Cited by 3,629
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationAnalysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors
Trengove, N. J., Stacey, M. C., Macauley, S., Bennett, N., Gibson, J., Burslem, F., Murphy, G., & Schultz, G. (1999) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00442.x · Cited by 908
Current wound healing procedures and potential care
Dreifke, M. B., Jayasuriya, A. A., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2015) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.068 · Cited by 538
Wound healing and treating wounds
Morton, L. M., & Phillips, T. J. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.068 · Cited by 475
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, M. H., Alvarez, A. F., Kirsner, R. S., Eaglstein, W. H., & Falanga, V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1054-1058
- ISSN
- 0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995482236
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human wound fluid from acute wounds stimulates fibroblast and endothelial cell growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0190-9622(91)70306-m
- The paper
- Katz, M. H., Alvarez, A. F., Kirsner, R. S., Eaglstein, W. H., & Falanga, V. (1991). Human wound fluid from acute wounds stimulates fibroblast and endothelial cell growth. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(91)70306-m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.