Cited by 121Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Ontogeny of vasopressin and oxytocin in the fetal rat: Early vasopressinergic innervation of the fetal brain

Open access
Buijs, R.M., Velis, D.N., Swaab, D.F.·1980·Peptides

Abstract

The content and distribution of vasopressin and oxytocin were determined during fetal development in the rat brain and pituitary by means of radioimmunoassay and immunocytochemistry. The vasopressin content in the fetal brain showed a gradual rise from day 16 of pregnancy onwards, while pituitary vasopressin rapidly increased from fetal day 19 until birth. The oxytocin content in the fetal brain was considerably lower than the vasopressin content. A decrease in oxytocin content was seen between day 16 and day 18 while from day 18 of pregnancy onwards a slight increase was found. The pituitary oxytocin content starts to rise between day 17 and 18 of pregnancy, but at term the pituitary oxytocin content was only 1/20 of the vasopressin value. Immunocytochemistry revealed that vasopressin levels in the fetal rat brain were not only due to the presence of the classical hypothalamoneurohypophyseal system, but also to the early development of exohypothalamic fibers. Vasopressin containing cells were seen from fetal day 16 in the supraoptic nucleus, and from fetal day 18 in the paraventricular nucleus. The fiber outgrowth of these cells towards the pituitary and extrahypothalamic brain sites seems to be well synchronized, as on day 17 vasopressin containing fibers could be demonstrated in the olfactory bulb as well as in the median eminence. No positive staining for oxytocin could be obtained in the fetal rat, while during the entire fetal period no positive staining was found in cell bodies in the region of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. The early peptidergic innervation of the brain, which enabled the tracing of the source of some exohypothalamic fibers, might be related to several central processes among which brain development itself is included.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0196-9781(80)90009-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buijs, R. M., Velis, D. N., & Swaab, D. F.
Corresponding author
Buijs, R.M.
Venue
Peptides
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
315-324
ISSN
0196-9781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079954880
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Peptides (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
vasopressin, oxytocin, fetal brain development, rat fetus, pituitary gland, supraoptic nucleus, paraventricular nucleus, median eminence, olfactory bulb, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Brain, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Male, Oxytocin, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Pregnancy, Rats, Inbred Strains, Supraoptic Nucleus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review