The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., & Ambroz, A. (1981) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8 · Cited by 1,349
Self-citationBias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials
Chalmers, T. C., Celano, P., Sacks, H. S., & Smith, H. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198312013092204 · Cited by 864
Self-citation
Cited by
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
(2008) · Cited by 3,790
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch8 · Cited by 3,396
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V., Akl, E. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Falck-Ytter, Y. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · Cited by 2,798
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 · Cited by 2,755
Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Schmid, C. H. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008 · Cited by 2,517
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w · Cited by 1,308
Guidelines for systematic review in Conservation and environmental management
PULLIN, A. S., & STEWART, G. B. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x · Cited by 1,137
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Self-citationProblems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence-Based Medicine”
Feinstein, A. R., & Horwitz, R. I. (1997) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00244-1 · Cited by 653
How to write a systematic review
Wright, R. W., Brand, R. A., Dunn, W., & Spindler, K. P. (2007) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/blo.0b013e31802c9098 · Cited by 606
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
Odgaard-Jensen, J., Vist, G. E., Timmer, A., Kunz, R., Akl, E. A., Schünemann, H., Briel, M., Nordmann, A. J., Pregno, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000012.pub3 · Cited by 439
Greenland, S. (2001) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/2.4.463 · Cited by 359
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
Lundh, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-22 · Cited by 352
Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis of Data from Epidemiologic Studies: A Commentary
Colditz, G. A., Burdick, E., & Mosteller, F. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117644 · Cited by 245
Self-citationDevelopment of a quality assessment instrument for trials of treatments for depression and neurosis
Moncrieff, J., Churchill, R., Drummond, D. C., & McGuire, H. (2001) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.108 · Cited by 185
Hewitt, C., Hahn, S., Torgerson, D. J., Watson, J., & Bland, J. M. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38413.576713.ae · Cited by 176
Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis
Hempel, S., Miles, J. N., Booth, M. J., Wang, Z., Morton, S. C., & Shekelle, P. G. (2013) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-107 · Cited by 137
Armijo-Olivo, S., Ospina, M., da Costa, B. R., Egger, M., Saltaji, H., Fuentes, J., Ha, C., & Cummings, G. G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096920 · Cited by 124
Wang, Y., Parpia, S., Couban, R., Wang, Q., Armijo-Olivo, S., Bassler, D., Briel, M., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Gluud, L. L., Keitz, S. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.11.001 · Cited by 58
On combining dose—response data from epidemiological studies by meta‐analysis
Smith, S. J., Caudill, S. L. P., Steinberg, K. K., & Thacker, S. B. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780140513 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, J. D., Burdick, E., Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C.
- Venue
- Controlled Clinical Trials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 339-352
- ISSN
- 0197-2456 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082942950
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
