Cited by 245Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis of Data from Epidemiologic Studies: A Commentary

Colditz, Graham A., Burdick, Elisabeth, Mosteller, Frederick·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Graham A. Colditz, Elisabeth Burdick, Frederick Mosteller; Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis of Data from Epidemiologic Studies: A Commentary, American Journal of

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117644

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colditz, G. A., Burdick, E., & Mosteller, F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Colditz, Graham A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-08-15
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
371-382
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2269058722
Cited by
245
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS05936)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
heterogeneity, meta-analysis, epidemiological studies, study heterogeneity, pooled estimates
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Models, Theoretical, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review