Cited by 30Bone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and treatmentsBone health and osteoporosis research

The effects of two diphosphonates on bone metabolism in the rat.

Evans, R.A., Baylink, D.J., Wergedal, J.·1979·Metabolic Bone Disease and Related Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0221-8747(79)90017-1

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, R. A., Baylink, D. J., & Wergedal, J.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Baylink, D.J.
Venue
Metabolic Bone Disease and Related Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
39-48
ISSN
0221-8747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031930092
Cited by
30
References
33
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Metabolic Bone Disease and Related Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
diphosphonates, ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate, dichloromethylene diphosphonate, bone resorption, bone formation, bone mineralization, osteoclasts, parathyroid hormone, serum calcium and phosphorus, low-dose effects, weanling rats, bone metabolism, dose-response relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review