The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.
Taylor, S. E. (1983) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.38.11.1161 · Cited by 3,051
Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer Patients
CASSILETH, B. R., ZUPKIS, R. V., SUTTON-SMITH, K., & MARCH, V. (1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832 · Cited by 1,144
Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 · Cited by 1,008
Self-citationFallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, G. P., & Baum, M. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575 · Cited by 750
Changes in Physicians' Attitudes Toward Telling the Cancer Patient
Novack, D. H. (1979) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1979.03290350017012 · Cited by 707
What to Tell Cancer Patients: A Study of Medical Attitudes
Oken, D. (1961) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1961.03040130004002 · Cited by 632
Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective
Stone, R. A. (1987) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)66432-1 · Cited by 597
Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?
Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198004173021605 · Cited by 525
Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients
Blanchard, C. G., Labrecque, M. S., Ruckdeschel, J. C., & Blanchard, E. B. (1988) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7 · Cited by 489
Cancer Patients: Their Desire for Information and Participation in Treatment Decisions
Sutherland, H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Lockwood, G. A., Tritchler, D. L., & Till, J. E. (1989) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107688908200506 · Cited by 436
Cited by
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137
Health Information—Seeking Behavior
Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732307305199 · Cited by 894
Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review
Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004 · Cited by 849
The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support
Butow, P. N., Maclean, M., Dunn, S. M., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Boyer, M. J. (1997) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1023/a:1008284006045 · Cited by 502
Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review
Gaston, C. M., & Mitchell, G. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Dyck, D. G.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-289
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037566012
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0
- The paper
- Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Dyck, D. G. (1994). Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
